No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: An on-farm assessment

被引:494
作者
Blanco-Canqui, Humberto [1 ]
Lal, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Nat Resources, FAES OARDC, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2007.0233
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 [农业资源与环境]; 090301 [土壤学];
摘要
No-tillage (NT) farming is superior to intensive tillage for conserving soil and water, yet its potential for sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC) in all environments as well as its impacts on soil profile SOC distribution are not well understood. Thus, we assessed the impacts of long-term NT-based cropping systems on SOC sequestration for the whole soil profile (0-60-cm soil depth) across 11 Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs: 121, 122, and 125 in Kentucky; 99, 124, 139A in Ohio; and 139B, 139C, 140, 147, and 148 in Pennsylvania) in the eastern United States. Soil was sampled in paired NT and plow tillage (PT) based cropping systems and an adjacent woodlot (WL). No-tillage farming impacts on SOC and N were soil specific. The SOC and N concentrations in NT soils were greater than those in PT soils in 5 out of 11 MLRAs (121, 122, 124, 139A, and 148), but only within the 0- to 10-cm depth. Below 10 cm, NT soils had lower SOC than PT soils in MLRA 124. The total SOC with NT for the whole soil profile (0-60 cm) did not differ from that with PT (P > 0.10) in accord with several previous studies. In fact, total soil profile SOC in PT soils was 50% higher in MLRA 125, 21% in MLRA 99, and 41% in MLRA 124 compared with that in NT soils. Overall, this study shows that NT farming increases SOC concentrations in the upper layers of some soils, but it does not store SOC more than PT soils for the whole soil profile.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 701
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Impact of tillage practices on organic carbon and nitrogen storage in cool, humid soils of eastern Canada [J].
Angers, DA ;
Bolinder, MA ;
Carter, MR ;
Gregorich, EG ;
Drury, CF ;
Liang, BC ;
Voroney, RP ;
Simard, RR ;
Donald, RG ;
Beyaert, RP ;
Martel, J .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1997, 41 (3-4) :191-201
[2]
[Anonymous], GLOSS SOIL SCI TERMS
[3]
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration - What do we really know? [J].
Baker, John M. ;
Ochsner, Tyson E. ;
Venterea, Rodney T. ;
Griffis, Timothy J. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :1-5
[4]
Soil and crop response to harvesting corn residues for biofuel production [J].
Blanco-Canqui, Humberto ;
Lal, R. .
GEODERMA, 2007, 141 (3-4) :355-362
[5]
BLANCOCANQUI H, 1910, SOIL TILL RES, V95, P240
[6]
EFFECTS OF SIMPLIFIED CULTIVATION ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF SPRING BARLEY ON A SANDY LOAM SOIL .2. SOIL PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES AND ROOT-GROWTH - ROOT - SHOOT RELATIONSHIPS, INFLOW RATES OF NITROGEN - WATER-USE [J].
BRAIM, MA ;
CHANEY, K ;
HODGSON, DR .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1992, 22 (1-2) :173-187
[7]
Long-term tillage effects on cool-season soybean in rotation with barley, soil properties and carbon and nitrogen storage for fine sandy loams in the humid climate of Atlantic Canada [J].
Carter, MR .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2005, 81 (01) :109-120
[8]
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Minnesota soil as related to tillage, residue and nitrogen management [J].
Dolan, MS ;
Clapp, CE ;
Allmaras, RR ;
Baker, JM ;
Molina, JAE .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2006, 89 (02) :221-231
[9]
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes [J].
Ellert, BH ;
Bettany, JR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1995, 75 (04) :529-538
[10]
Grossman R.B., 2002, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, P201, DOI [10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c9, DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4.C9]