Exploring 3D-QSAR of thiazole and thiadiazole derivatives as potent and selective human adenosine A3 receptor antagonists+

被引:12
作者
Bhattacharya, P [1 ]
Leonard, JT [1 ]
Roy, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Technol, Div Med Chem & Pharmaceut, Drug Theoret & Cheminformat Lab, Kolkata 700032, India
关键词
QSAR; MSA; MFA; thiazole; thiadiazole; adenosine A(3) receptor;
D O I
10.1007/s00894-005-0273-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Binding affinity data [Bioorg Med Chem (2004) 12:613-623] of thiazole and thiadiazole derivatives (n = 30) for the human adenosine A(3) receptor subtype have been subjected to 3D-QSAR (Quantitative structure-activity relationships) analyses by molecular shape analysis (MSA) and molecular field analysis (MFA) techniques using Cerius2 Version 4.8. In the case of the MSA, the major steps were (1) generation of conformers and energy minimization; (2) hypothesizing an active conformer (global minimum of the most active compound); (3) selecting a candidate shape-reference compound (based on the active conformation); (4) performing pairwise molecular superimposition using the maximum common subgroup (MCSG) method; (5) measuring molecular shape commonality using MSA descriptors; (6) determining other molecular features by calculating spatial, electronic and conformational parameters; (7) selection of conformers; (8) generation of QSAR equations by genetic function algorithm (GFA) or stepwise regression. The best 3D-QSAR equation (MSA) obtained from GFA technique shows 70.0% predicted variance (leave-one-out) and 77.7% explained variance. This equation shows the importance of Jurs descriptors (atomic charge weighted positive surface area, relative negative charge and relative positive charge surface area), partial moment of inertia, energy of the most stable conformer and the ratio of common overlap steric volume to volume of individual molecules. In the case of stepwise regression, the best relation showed 46.1% predicted variance and 72.3% explained variance. In the case of MFA, the major steps were (1) generating conformers and energy minimization; (2) matching atoms using a maximum common substructure (MCS) search and aligning molecules using the default options; (3) setting MFA preferences (rectangular grid with 2 angstrom step size, charges by the Gasteiger algorithm, H+ and CH3 as probes); (4) creating the field; (5) analysis by the Genetic partial least squares (G/PLS) method. The equation obtained was of excellent statistical quality: 96.1% explained variance and 71.6% predicted variance. Statistically reliable 3D-QSAR models obtained from this study suggest that these techniques could be useful to design potent A(3) receptor antagonists.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 524
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ACC INC, 2002, CER VERS 4 8
[2]   Recent developments in the field of A3 adenosine receptor antagonists [J].
Baraldi, PG ;
Tabrizi, MA ;
Fruttarolo, F ;
Bovero, A ;
Avitabile, B ;
Preti, D ;
Romagnoli, R ;
Merighi, S ;
Gessi, S ;
Varani, K ;
Borea, PA .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2003, 58 (04) :315-329
[3]  
Baraldi PG, 1999, DRUG DEVELOP RES, V46, P126, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2299(199902)46:2<126::AID-DDR5>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-7
[5]   Exploring QSAR of thiazole and thiadiazole derivatives as potent and selective human adenosine A3 receptor antagonists using FA and GFA techniques [J].
Bhattacharya, P ;
Leonard, JT ;
Roy, K .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 13 (04) :1159-1165
[6]   Gene knockout approach to adenosine A2A receptors in Parkinson's disease [J].
Chen, JF ;
Schwarzschild, MA .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2003, 58 (04) :354-367
[7]   Adenosine and synaptic plasticity [J].
de Mendoncça, A ;
Ribeiro, JA .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (1-2) :283-290
[8]  
Debnath Asim Kumar, 2001, P73
[9]   CoMFA-based comparison of two models of binding site on adenosine A1 receptor [J].
Doytchinova, I .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (01) :29-39
[10]  
Doytchinova I, 2001, QUANT STRUCT-ACT REL, V20, P124, DOI 10.1002/1521-3838(200107)20:2<124::AID-QSAR124>3.0.CO