Automatic brain tumor detection in MRI: methodology and statistical validation

被引:16
作者
Iftekharuddin, KM [1 ]
Islam, MA [1 ]
Shaik, J [1 ]
Parra, C [1 ]
Ogg, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Memphis State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Intelligent Syst & Image Proc Lab, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: IMAGE PROCESSING, PT 1-3 | 2005年 / 5747卷
关键词
automatic segmentation; classification; fractal analysis; mulitresolution texture; maunetic resonance images; multiresolution wavelets; sensitivity and specificity; receiver operatina curve; neural network;
D O I
10.1117/12.595931
中图分类号
TB8 [摄影技术];
学科分类号
0804 ;
摘要
Automated brain tumor segmentation and detection are immensely important in medical diagnostics because it provides information associated to anatomical structures as well as potential abnormal tissue necessary to delineate appropriate surgical planning. In this work, we propose a novel automated brain tumor segmentation technique based on multiresolution texture information that combines fractal Brownian motion (fBm) and wavelet multiresolution analysis. Our wavelet-fractal technique combines the excellent multiresolution localization property of wavelets to texture extraction of fractal. We prove the efficacy of our technique by successfully segmenting pediatric brain MR images (MRIs) from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. We use self-organizing map (SOM) as our clustering tool wherein we exploit both pixel intensity and multiresolution texture features to obtain segmented tumor. Our test results show that our technique successfully segments abnormal brain tissues in a set of T1 images. In the next step, we design a classifier using Feed-Forward (FF) neural network to statistically validate the presence of tumor in MRI using both the multiresolution texture and the pixel intensity features. We estimate the corresponding receiver operating curve (ROC) based on the findings of true positive fractions and false positive fractions estimated from our classifier at different threshold values. An ROC, which can be considered as a gold standard to prove the competence of a classifier, is obtained to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of our classifier. We observe that at threshold 0.4 we achieve trite positive value of 1.0 (100%) sacrificing only 0.16 (16%)false positive value for the set of 50 T1 MRI analyzed in this experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:2012 / 2022
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALIREZAIE J, 1996, NUCL SCI S 1996 IEEE, V3, P1777
[2]  
ALIREZAIE J, 1995, NUCL SCI S MED IMAGI, V3, P1397
[3]   Super-rough dynamics on tumor growth [J].
Bru, A ;
Pastor, JM ;
Fernaud, I ;
Bru, I ;
Melle, S ;
Berenguer, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (18) :4008-4011
[4]  
DEMUTH H, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS TOOL
[5]  
Eliat PA, 2002, TR APPL SPECT, V4, P1
[6]  
FORSEE FD, 1997, P 1997 INT JOINT C N
[7]   Comparison of automated and visual texture analysis in MRI: Characterization of normal and diseased skeletal muscle [J].
Herlidou, S ;
Rolland, Y ;
Bansard, JY ;
Le Rumeur, E ;
de Certaines, JD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (09) :1393-1397
[8]   Fractal analysis of tumor in brain MR images [J].
Iftekharuddin, KM ;
Jia, W ;
Marsh, R .
MACHINE VISION AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (5-6) :352-362
[9]  
IFTEKHARUDDIN KM, 2003, COMPUTATIONAL INTELL
[10]  
IFTEKHARUDDIN KM, 2004, NEUROIMAGING, pCH4