Self-calibration of cluster dark energy studies: Observable-mass distribution

被引:161
作者
Lima, M [1 ]
Hu, W
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Kavli Inst Cosmol Phys, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2005年 / 72卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043006
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The exponential sensitivity of cluster number counts to the properties of the dark energy implies a comparable sensitivity to not only the mean but also the actual distribution of an observable-mass proxy given the true cluster mass. For example a 25% scatter in mass can provide a similar to 50% change in the number counts at z similar to 2 for the upcoming SPT survey. Uncertainty in the scatter of this amount would degrade dark energy constraints to uninteresting levels. Given the shape of the actual mass function, the properties of the distribution may be internally monitored by the shape of the observable mass function. As a proof of principle, for a simple mass-independent Gaussian distribution the scatter may be self-calibrated to allow a measurement of the dark energy equation of state of sigma(w)similar to 0.1. External constraints on the mass variance of the distribution that are more accurate than Delta sigma(2)(lnM)< 0.01 at z similar to 1 can further improve constraints by up to a factor of 2. More generally, cluster counts and their sample variance measured as a function of the observable provide internal consistency checks on the assumed form of the observable-mass distribution that will protect against misinterpretation of the dark energy constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Constraining cosmological parameters using Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster surveys [J].
Battye, RA ;
Weller, J .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2003, 68 (08)
[2]  
Eddington A. S., 1913, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, V73, P359, DOI DOI 10.1093/MNRAS/73.5.359
[3]   The Red-sequence Cluster Survey. I. The survey and cluster catalogs for patches RCS 0926+37 and RCS 1327+29 [J].
Gladders, MD ;
Yee, HKC .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2005, 157 (01) :1-29
[4]   Constraints on cosmological parameters from future galaxy cluster surveys [J].
Haiman, Z ;
Mohr, JJ ;
Holder, GP .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 553 (02) :545-561
[5]  
HEITMANN K, IN PRESS ASTROPHYS J
[6]  
HENNAWI J, IN PRESS
[7]   Constraints on Ωm, ΩΛ, and σ8 from galaxy cluster redshift distributions [J].
Holder, G ;
Haiman, ZN ;
Mohr, JJ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 560 (02) :L111-L114
[8]   Expectations for an interferometric Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect survey for galaxy clusters [J].
Holder, GP ;
Mohr, JJ ;
Carlstrom, JE ;
Evrard, AE ;
Leitch, EM .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 544 (02) :629-635
[9]   Sample variance considerations for cluster surveys [J].
Hu, W ;
Kravtsov, AV .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 584 (02) :702-715
[10]   Joint galaxy-lensing observables and the dark energy [J].
Hu, W ;
Jain, B .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (04)