Ethnic Differences in the Association Between Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy Outcome

被引:41
作者
Mocarski, M. [1 ]
Savitz, D. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Community Hlth & Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus; Ethnicity; New York City; Macrosomia; Cesarean; BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA; RACE-SPECIFIC CRITERIA; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; CLINICAL ESTIMATE; RISK-FACTORS; WEIGHT; VALIDATION; WOMEN; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-011-0760-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to examine ethnic variation in the impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) on birth outcome. The authors examined the association between GDM and pregnancy-induced hypertension, macrosomia, primary Cesarean delivery, and preterm birth, using New York City Birth Certificate data from 2001-2006. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the crude and adjusted odds ratios of GDM with each adverse perinatal event, stratified by ethnicity. GDM was associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal events among all ethnic groups, with modest variation by ethnicity. Across ethnic groups, adjusted odds ratios comparing women with and without GDM ranged from 1.4-2.9 for pregnancy-induced hypertension, 1.0-2.2 for macrosomia, 1.1-1.8 for primary Cesarean delivery, and 1.3-1.8 for preterm birth. Overall, Caribbean, Sub-Saharan African, and African American women tended to show a larger relative impact of GDM, while North African, South Central Asian, and Chinese women showed a comparatively smaller impact of GDM. Although some ethnic variation was seen, differences in effect size were not large enough to support ethnic-specific thresholds for GDM diagnosis and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 373
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes [J].
Ananth, Cande V. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 21 :22-30
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SAS ONLINEDOC 9 1 3
[4]  
Baraban Elizabeth, 2008, Prev Chronic Dis, V5, pA77
[5]  
Baumeister L, 2000, HEALTH SERV RES, V35, P869
[6]   THE QUALITY OF THE NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA - A VALIDATION-STUDY IN NORTH-CAROLINA [J].
BUESCHER, PA ;
TAYLOR, KP ;
DAVIS, MH ;
BOWLING, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (08) :1163-1165
[7]   How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. [J].
Dobie S.A. ;
Baldwin L.M. ;
Rosenblatt R.A. ;
Fordyce M.A. ;
Andrilla C.H. ;
Hart L.G. .
Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1998, 2 (3) :145-154
[8]   Fetal and maternal outcomes in Indo-Asian compared to Caucasian women with diabetes in pregnancy [J].
Dunne, FP ;
Brydon, PA ;
Proffitt, M ;
Smith, T ;
Gee, H ;
Holder, RL .
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS, 2000, 93 (12) :813-818
[9]   Screening for gestational diabetes: Different cut-offs for different ethnicities? [J].
Esakoff, TF ;
Cheng, YW ;
Caughey, AB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) :1040-1044
[10]   Medical, psychosocial, and behavioral risk factors do not explain the increased risk for low birth weight among black women [J].
Goldenberg, RL ;
Cliver, SP ;
Mulvihill, FX ;
Hickey, CA ;
Hoffman, HJ ;
Klerman, LV ;
Johnson, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (05) :1317-1324