Basal phenotype: a powerful prognostic factor in small screen-detected invasive breast cancer with long-term follow-up

被引:23
作者
Evans, A. J. [1 ]
Rakha, E. A. [2 ]
Pinder, S. E. [3 ]
Green, A. R. [4 ]
Paish, C. [2 ]
Ellis, I. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] City Hosp Nottingham, Breast Inst, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] City Hosp Nottingham, Dept Histopathol, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[3] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Mol Med Sci, Div Pathol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1258/096914107782912004
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the frequency and prognostic significance of a basal phenotype in a group of women with screen-detected invasive breast cancers with long-term follow-up and to focus particularly on women with small (< 15 mm) breast cancers. Methods The study group was derived by finding women common to a consecutive series of 1944 invasive breast cancers diagnosed in Nottingham between 1986 and 1998 with a known basal phenotype status and a prospectively collected database of all screen-detected breast cancers. In total, 356 women constituted the study group. Pathological and radiological features were recorded. Basal cell markers used were CK5/6 (cloneD5/16134) and CK14 (clone LL002). Tumours were classified as of basal phenotype if > or = 10% staining was seen with either marker. Results Of all screen-detected lesions, 43 (12%) had a basal immunophenotype and 313 (88%) were non-basal. There were 15 (35%) and 40 (13%) breast cancer deaths in the basal group and non-basal groups, respectively (P=0.0006). On univariate analysis, nodal stage, histological grade, lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) status, invasive size and basal phenotype had prognostic significance. On multivariate analysis, basal phenotype, LVI and nodal stage maintain prognostic significance. Of the 189 women with < 15 mm lesions, eight of 20 (40%) of the basal group and eight of 169 (5%) of the non-basal group died of breast cancer (P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, basal phenotype was the only factor to maintain independent prognostic significance. Conclusions Basal phenotype is a powerful prognostic factor for women with small screen-detected invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-H
[3]  
DAIRKEE SH, 1987, LANCET, V1, P514
[4]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[5]  
Evans A, 2006, AJR, V187, P1
[6]   Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers? [J].
James, JJ ;
Evans, AJ ;
Pinder, SE ;
Macmillan, RD ;
Wilson, ARM ;
Ellis, IO .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (01) :54-62
[7]   Molecular cytogenetic identification of subgroups of grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas with different clinical outcomes [J].
Jones, C ;
Ford, E ;
Gillett, C ;
Ryder, K ;
Merrett, S ;
Reis, JS ;
Fulford, LG ;
Hanby, A ;
Lakhani, SR .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (18) :5988-5997
[8]   Blood vessel invasion as a predictor of long-term survival for Japanese patients with breast cancer [J].
Kato, T ;
Kameoka, S ;
Kimura, T ;
Nishikawa, T ;
Kobayashi, M .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 73 (01) :1-12
[9]   CHARACTERIZATION OF BREAST CARCINOMAS BY 2 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES DISTINGUISHING MYOEPITHELIAL FROM LUMINAL EPITHELIAL-CELLS [J].
NAGLE, RB ;
BOCKER, W ;
DAVIS, JR ;
HEID, HW ;
KAUFMANN, M ;
LUCAS, DO ;
JARASCH, ED .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1986, 34 (07) :869-881
[10]   Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma [J].
Nielsen, TO ;
Hsu, FD ;
Jensen, K ;
Cheang, M ;
Karaca, G ;
Hu, ZY ;
Hernandez-Boussard, T ;
Livasy, C ;
Cowan, D ;
Dressler, L ;
Akslen, LA ;
Ragaz, J ;
Gown, AM ;
Gilks, CB ;
van de Rijn, MV ;
Perou, CM .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (16) :5367-5374