A comparative evaluation of software for the analysis of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry data from isotope coded affinity tag experiments

被引:22
作者
Moulder, R
Filén, JJ
Salmi, J
Katajamaa, M
Nevalainen, OS
Oresic, M
Aittokallio, T
Lahesmaa, R
Nyman, TA
机构
[1] Turku Univ, Turku Ctr Biotechnol, Turku 20521, Finland
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Turku, Finland
[3] Dept Informat Technol, Turku, Finland
[4] Turku Ctr Comp Sci, Turku, Finland
[5] VTT Biotechnol, Espoo, Finland
[6] Turku Univ, Dept Math, Turku 20521, Finland
关键词
isotope coded affinity tag; protein quantification; software evaluation; tandem mass spectrometry;
D O I
10.1002/pmic.200401187
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The options available for processing quantitative data from isotope coded affinity tag (ICAT) experiments have mostly been confined to software specific to the instrument of acquisition. However, recent developments with data format conversion have subsequently increased such processing opportunities. In the present study, data sets from ICAT experiments, analysed with liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), using an Applied Biosystems QSTAR (R) Pulsar quadrupole-TOF mass spectrometer, were processed in triplicate using separate mass spectrometry software packages. The programs Pro ICAT, Spectrum Mill and SEQUEST with XPRESS were employed. Attention was paid towards the extent of common identification and agreement of quantitative results, with additional interest in the flexibility and productivity of these programs. The comparisons were made with data from the analysis of a specifically prepared test mixture, nine proteins at a range of relative concentration ratios from 0.1 to 10 (light to heavy labelled forms), as a known control, and data selected from an ICAT study involving the measurement of cytokine induced protein expression in human lymphoblasts, as an applied example. Dissimilarities were detected in peptide identification that reflected how the associated scoring parameters favoured information from the MS/MS data sets. Accordingly, there were differences in the numbers of peptides and protein identifications, although from these it was apparent that both confirmatory and complementary information was present. In the quantitative results from the three programs, no statistically significant differences were observed.
引用
收藏
页码:2748 / 2760
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Mass spectrometry in proteomics [J].
Aebersold, R ;
Goodlett, DR .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 101 (02) :269-295
[2]   A universal denoising and peak picking algorithm for LC-MS based on matched filtration in the chromatographic time domain [J].
Andreev, VP ;
Rejtar, T ;
Chen, HS ;
Moskovets, EV ;
Ivanov, AR ;
Karger, BL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (22) :6314-6326
[3]   Evaluation of algorithms for protein identification from sequence databases using mass spectrometry data [J].
Chamrad, DC ;
Körting, G ;
Stühler, K ;
Meyer, HE ;
Klose, J ;
Blüggel, M .
PROTEOMICS, 2004, 4 (03) :619-628
[4]   TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra [J].
Craig, R ;
Beavis, RC .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (09) :1466-1467
[5]  
Eddes JS, 2002, PROTEOMICS, V2, P1097, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1097::AID-PROT1097>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-X
[7]   AN APPROACH TO CORRELATE TANDEM MASS-SPECTRAL DATA OF PEPTIDES WITH AMINO-ACID-SEQUENCES IN A PROTEIN DATABASE [J].
ENG, JK ;
MCCORMACK, AL ;
YATES, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 1994, 5 (11) :976-989
[8]   A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes [J].
Fenyö, D ;
Beavis, RC .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (04) :768-774
[9]   Open mass spectrometry search algorithm [J].
Geer, LY ;
Markey, SP ;
Kowalak, JA ;
Wagner, L ;
Xu, M ;
Maynard, DM ;
Yang, XY ;
Shi, WY ;
Bryant, SH .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2004, 3 (05) :958-964
[10]   Proteome analysis of low-abundance proteins using multidimensional chromatography and isotope-coded affinity tags [J].
Gygi, SP ;
Rist, B ;
Griffin, TJ ;
Eng, J ;
Aebersold, R .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2002, 1 (01) :47-54