Meta-Analysis of Facial Affect Recognition Difficulties After Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:163
作者
Babbage, Duncan R. [1 ]
Yim, Jackki [1 ]
Zupan, Barbra [2 ]
Neumann, Dawn [3 ]
Tomita, Machiko R. [4 ]
Willer, Barry [5 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Psychol, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
[2] Brock Univ, Dept Appl Linguist, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Rehabil Sci, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[5] SUNY Buffalo, Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Psychiat & Rehabil Med, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
affect recognition; emotion perception; traumatic brain injury; meta-analysis; CLOSED-HEAD INJURY; EMOTION RECOGNITION; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION DEFICITS; COMMUNICATION; EXPRESSION; INDIVIDUALS; ADULTS; MIND; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1037/a0021908
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 [应用心理学];
摘要
Difficulties in communication and social relationships present a formidable challenge for many people after traumatic brain injury (TBI). These difficulties are likely to be partially attributable to problems with emotion perception. Mounting evidence shows facial affect recognition to be particularly difficult after TBI. However, no attempt has been made to systematically estimate the magnitude of this problem or the frequency with which it occurs. Method: A meta-analysis is presented examining the magnitude of facial affect recognition difficulties after TBI. From this, the frequency of these impairments in the TBI population is estimated. Effect sizes were calculated from 13 studies that compared adults with moderate to severe TBI to matched healthy controls on static measures of facial affect recognition. Results: The studies collectively presented data from 296 adults with TBI and 296 matched controls. The overall weighted mean effect size for the 13 studies was -1.11, indicating people with TBI on average perform about 1.1 SD below healthy peers on measures of facial affect recognition. Based on estimation of the TBI population standard deviation and modeling of likely distribution shape, it is estimated that between 13% and 39% of people with moderate to severe TBI may have significant difficulties with facial affect recognition, depending on the cut-off criterion used. Conclusion: This is clearly an area that warrants attention, particularly examining techniques for the rehabilitation of these deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 285
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
Facial affect recognition in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis [J].
Addington, Jean ;
Penn, David ;
Woods, Scott W. ;
Addington, Donald ;
Perkins, Diana O. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 192 (01) :67-68
[2]
Neuropsychological correlates of impaired emotion recognition following traumatic brain injury [J].
Allerdings, MD ;
Alfano, DP .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2006, 60 (02) :193-194
[3]
[Anonymous], 1983, Journal of Educational Statistics, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1164923, DOI 10.3102/1076998600800215]
[4]
Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury [J].
Bibby, H ;
McDonald, S .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 43 (01) :99-114
[5]
Disturbances in affective communication following brain injury [J].
Borgaro, SR ;
Prigatano, GP ;
Kwasnica, C ;
Alcott, S ;
Cutter, N .
BRAIN INJURY, 2004, 18 (01) :33-39
[6]
Emotion perception deficits following traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence and rationale for intervention [J].
Bornhofen, Cristina ;
Mcdonald, Skye .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 14 (04) :511-525
[7]
Treating deficits in emotion perception following traumatic brain injury [J].
Bornhofen, Cristina ;
McDonald, Skye .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (01) :22-44
[8]
Braun C M, 1989, Brain Inj, V3, P5, DOI 10.3109/02699058909008068
[9]
Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury [J].
Calder, AJ ;
Keane, J ;
Manes, F ;
Antoun, N ;
Young, AW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (11) :1077-1078
[10]
Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury [J].
Croker, V ;
McDonald, S .
BRAIN INJURY, 2005, 19 (10) :787-799