Effects of ant behaviour and presence of extrafloral nectaries on seed dispersal of the Neotropical myrmecochore Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae)

被引:52
作者
Cuautle, M
Rico-Gray, V
Diaz-Castelazo, C
机构
[1] Inst Ecol, Dept Ecol Funct, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
[2] Inst Ecol, Dept Ecol Aplicada, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
关键词
defence; elaiosome; Mexico; myrmecochory; sand dune matorral; seed removal rate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00525.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper describes the myrmecochory system of Turnera ulmifolia in a coastal sand dune matorral in Mexico. Turnera ulmifolia has elaiosome-bearing seeds and extrafloral nectaries (EFNs). In ten quadrants (4 x 15 m) ant-seed interaction was monitored, and an interaction intensity index calculated and correlated with the number of seedlings. Seed removal rates by ants were surveyed every 2 h for 24 h, the ants being observed both on and beneath the plants. The role of the elaiosome in seed removal was evaluated by offering seeds with and without elaiosomes, and elaiosomes only. Finally, the effect of ant manipulation in seed germination was evaluated. There were 25 ant species associated with seeds and/or EFNs, the most frequently recorded being Monomorium cyaneum and Forelius analis. There was a positive correlation between the intensity index and seedling number per quadrant. There was significantly higher mean seed removal during the day than during the night (19.3% and 12.3%, respectively), and from beneath than on the plant (21.9% and 9.5%, respectively). The preference for elaiosomes only was also greater during the diurnal period, and when gathered on, rather than beneath, the plant. Seed manipulation by F analis enhanced germination by T ulmifolia. Seed removal, dispersal distances, seed predation and germination were largely determined by ant behaviour. The presence of EFNs may be influencing seed removal on the plant by attracting a specific assemblage of omnivorous ants. Among such assemblages associated with T ulmifolia we encountered a variety of behaviours, with ant species either good at defending plants but bad at dispersing seeds, or vice versa. We discuss the way in which these two rewards, and the processes involved (defence and dispersion), could have interacted with each other and evolved. (c) 2005 The Linnean Society of London
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SEED DISPERSAL ANTS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The coevolutionary process
[3]  
BARRETT SCH, 1987, EVOLUTION, V41, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05802.x
[4]  
BEATTIE A.J., 1985, The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms
[5]   SEED DISPERSAL IN VIOLA (VIOLACEAE) - ADAPTATIONS AND STRATEGIES [J].
BEATTIE, AJ ;
LYONS, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1975, 62 (07) :714-722
[6]  
Beattie Andrew J., 2002, P211
[7]   EXTRAFLORAL NECTARIES - A DEFENSE AGAINST ANT-HOMOPTERA MUTUALISMS [J].
BECERRA, JXI ;
VENABLE, DL .
OIKOS, 1989, 55 (02) :276-280
[8]   EXTRA-FLORAL NECTARIES AND PROTECTION BY PUGNACIOUS BODYGUARDS [J].
BENTLEY, BL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1977, 8 :407-427
[9]  
CASTILLOCAMPOS G, 2002, ARBLES ARBUSTOS RESE
[10]  
Cogni Rodrigo, 2000, Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, V136, P141