Near-field pollutant dispersion in the built environment by CFD and wind tunnel simulations

被引:92
作者
Chavez, Mauricio [1 ]
Hajra, Bodhisatta [1 ]
Stathopoulos, Ted [1 ]
Bahloul, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Inst Rech Robert Sauve Sante & Securite Travail I, Montreal, PQ H3A 3C2, Canada
关键词
Pollution; Dispersion; CFD; Schmidt number; Multiple building; Re-ingestion; Stack; Wind tunnel; TURBULENT SCHMIDT NUMBER; BOUNDARY-LAYER; MODELS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings are always found to be in the vicinity of other buildings, especially in urban areas. This causes effluents released from stacks located on one of the buildings to re-enter the same or an adjacent building, generating potential health problems to the occupants of the building. Earlier, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been used in simulating pollutant transport for isolated buildings, with only few studies examining the effects of adjacent buildings. In this paper three cases that include an isolated low-rise building (source), a taller building placed upwind of the source and a case with taller buildings placed upwind and downwind of the source were considered. CFD simulations using the Realizable kappa-epsilon model for different turbulent Schmidt numbers (Sc(t)) and wind tunnel experiments were performed for these cases. ASHRAE, 2007 was also used to assess plume dispersion for the isolated building. It was found that a strong dependence of Sc(t), on CFD simulations of pollutant transport exists for the isolated building configuration. However, variations of Sc(t) have less impact on assessing pollutant dispersion in the presence of adjacent buildings. The ASHRAE, 2007 model predicted very low dilutions for the isolated building, making it necessary to re-visit its formulations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 339
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, FLUENT 6 1 US GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ASHRAE APPL HDB
[3]   Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: Comparisons between models and experiments [J].
Blocken, B. ;
Stathopoulos, T. ;
Saathoff, P. ;
Wang, X. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) :1817-1831
[4]   CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Stathopoulos, Ted ;
Carmeliet, Jan .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (02) :238-252
[5]  
BRIGGS GA, 1984, DEOTIC27601
[6]  
Cheng Y, 2003, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V91, P1301, DOI [10.1016/j.jweia.2003.08.001, 10.1016/j.jweia.2003.08.004]
[7]   Flow field measurements in the proximity of an urban intersection in London, UK [J].
Dobre, A ;
Arnold, SJ ;
Smalley, RJ ;
Boddy, JWD ;
Barlow, JF ;
Tomlin, AS ;
Belcher, SE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (26) :4647-4657
[8]   AN ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OF FLUX-GRADIENT RELATIONSHIPS AT THE 1976 ITCE [J].
DYER, AJ ;
BRADLEY, EF .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1982, 22 (01) :3-19
[9]   Turbulent Schmidt number from a tracer experiment [J].
Flesch, TK ;
Prueger, JH ;
Hatfield, JL .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2002, 111 (04) :299-307
[10]  
Franke J., 2007, COST Action 732, Quality Assurance and Improvement of Microscale Meteorological Models