Why are women underused in the JECH peer review process?

被引:11
作者
Davo, MD [1 ]
Vives, C [1 ]
Alvarez-Dardet, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.57.12.936
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 937
页数:2
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PEER REV HLTH SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CIENCIA Y FEMINISMO
[3]  
Colomer Revuelta C., 2002, Gac Sanit, V16, P358
[4]   Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example [J].
Dickersin, K ;
Fredman, L ;
Flegal, KM ;
Scott, JD ;
Crawley, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :260-264
[5]  
García A.M., 2002, Gac Sanit, V16, P244
[6]   IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS [J].
GILBERT, JR ;
WILLIAMS, ES ;
LUNDBERG, GD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02) :139-142
[7]  
Miqueo C., 2001, PERSPECTIVAS GENERO
[8]  
Schiaffino A, 2001, Gac Sanit, V15, P251