Using goal attainment scaling to improve the quality of long-term care: a group-randomized trial

被引:13
作者
Bravo, G [1 ]
Dubois, MF [1 ]
Roy, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Geriatr Inst, Res Ctr Aging, Sherbrooke, PQ J1H 4C4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aged; goal attainment scaling; group-randomized trial; improvement; long-term care setting; quality of care;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzi064
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To assess the effect of a 6-month interdisciplinary customized intervention based on goal attainment scaling and aimed at improving the quality of care provided by long-term care facilities to frail older adults. Design. A pair-matched group-randomized trial with quality of care measurements taken before and after the intervention and 6 months later. Settings. Forty unregulated small-to-medium sized long-term care facilities delivering inadequate care to at least one resident. Facilities were matched on baseline quality of care, health district, and size. One member of each pair was then randomly allocated to the intervention, the other acting as a control. Study participants. The trial involved 201 frail older adults randomly selected from the 40 participating facilities. Intervention. The intervention was tailored to the main quality problems identified at baseline in the facility. The first task of the intervention team was to set weighted quality improvement goals with the facility manager, which were then recorded on a goal attainment follow-up guide. Subsequent monthly on-site visits, interspersed with frequent telephone calls, were meant to assist the manager and staff to implement permanent changes in the areas of care targeted for improvement. Main outcome measure. Quality of care measured with the Quality of Care (QUALCARE) Scale, a multidimensional instrument that uses a 5-point scale to assess six subdimensions of care: environmental, physical, medical management, psychosocial, human rights, and financial. A score greater than 2 is considered indicative of inadequate care. Results. The intervention effect on the overall quality of care was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Change from baseline to the end of the intervention averaged .21 and .22 in the experimental and control conditions, respectively (P=0.86). Conclusion. Attainment of preset quality improvement objectives did not translate into detectable improvements in the care provided to residents.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Relationship between regulatory status, quality of care, and three-year mortality in Canadian residential care facilities:: A longitudinal study [J].
Bravo, G ;
Dubois, MF ;
De Wals, P ;
Hébert, R ;
Messier, L .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 37 (05) :1181-1196
[2]  
Bravo G, 1998, CAN MED ASSOC J, V159, P143
[3]   Correlates of care quality in long-term care facilities: A multilevel analysis [J].
Bravo, G ;
De Wals, P ;
Dubois, MF ;
Charpentier, M .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1999, 54 (03) :P180-P188
[4]  
Bravo G, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P1441
[5]  
Bravo G, 1995, J ELDER ABUSE NEGL, V7, P29
[6]  
Bravo Gina, 2005, J Am Med Dir Assoc, V6, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.01.002
[7]   RELIABILITY OF THE REVISED FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (SMAF) FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH [J].
DESROSIERS, J ;
BRAVO, G ;
HEBERT, R ;
DUBUC, N .
AGE AND AGEING, 1995, 24 (05) :402-406
[8]   Which residential care facilities are delivering inadequate care? A simple case-finding questionnaire [J].
Dubois, MF ;
Bravo, G ;
Charpentier, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2001, 20 (03) :339-355
[9]  
Elbourne DR, 2001, STAT MED, V20, P489, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<489::AID-SIM806>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-S