Innateness and canalization

被引:46
作者
Ariew, A
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
关键词
D O I
10.1086/289932
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Cognitive scientists often employ the notion of innateness without defining it. The issue is, how is innateness defined in biology? Some critics contend that innateness is not a legitimate concept in biology. In this paper I will argue that it is. However, neither the concept of high heritability nor the concept of flat norm of reaction (two popular accounts in the biology literature) define innateness. An adequate account is found in developmental biology. I propose that innateness is best defined in terms of C. H. Waddington's concept of canalization.
引用
收藏
页码:S19 / S27
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条