Endoscopic axillary surgery in breast cancer

被引:16
作者
Kuehn, T
Santjohanser, C
Grab, D
Klauss, W
Koretz, K
Kreienberg, R
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Pathol, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01751.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim was to provide an assessment of the current status of endoscopic axillary surgery in patients with breast cancer. Methods: Fifty-three patients underwent endoscopic lymphadenectomy. The surgical efficiency (operating time, number of resected nodes, intraoperative and postoperative complications), short-term morbidity (duration of drainage, total lymph flow, seroma rate) and long-term outcome (pain, numbness, mobility, strength, oedema) were assessed. The incidence and severity of different arm symptoms were compared with the results of 396 patients treated with a conventional axillary procedure. Finally, all available data relating to endoscopic axillary surgery were reviewed. Results: The operating time ranged from 60 to 150 min. A mean 17 (range 10-28) lymph nodes was resected. The extent of postoperative lymphorrhoea (mean 372 ml) and the seroma rate (eight of 34 patients) were not significantly reduced in comparison with conventional surgery. The assessment of long-term morbidity revealed fewer disturbances of sensitivity and a decreased rate of severe symptom intensity for pain, oedema and complaints related to mobility. Conclusion: Despite excellent visualization of anatomical landmarks and improved long-term morbidity, endoscopic lymph node dissection cannot be regarded as a suitable technique for routine axillary management in breast cancer because of long operating times.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 703
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Is the port site really at risk? Biology, mechanisms and prevention: A critical view [J].
Allardyce, RA .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (07) :479-485
[2]
Brun J.-L., 1997, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, V26, P503
[3]
Axillary lymphadenectomy prepared by fat and lymph node suction in breast cancer [J].
Brun, JL ;
Rousseau, E ;
Belleannee, G ;
de Mascarel, A ;
Brun, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 24 (01) :17-20
[4]
POSTOPERATIVE SEROMA FOLLOWING MASTECTOMY AND AXILLARY DISSECTION [J].
BRYANT, M ;
BAUM, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (12) :1187-1187
[5]
Burak WE, 1997, J SURG ONCOL, V64, P27, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199701)64:1<27::AID-JSO6>3.3.CO
[6]
2-9
[7]
Cangiotti L, 1999, J EXP CLIN CANC RES, V18, P295
[8]
EFFECT OF SHOULDER IMMOBILIZATION ON WOUND SEROMA AND SHOULDER DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING MODIFIED RADICAL-MASTECTOMY - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
DAWSON, I ;
STAM, L ;
HESLINGA, JM ;
KALSBEEK, HL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (03) :311-312
[9]
10-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING RADICAL MASTECTOMY AND TOTAL MASTECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT RADIATION [J].
FISHER, B ;
REDMOND, C ;
FISHER, ER ;
BAUER, M ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MONTAGUE, E ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
FOSTER, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (11) :674-681
[10]
Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer [J].
Giuliano, AE ;
Haigh, PI ;
Brennan, MB ;
Hansen, NM ;
Kelley, MC ;
Ye, W ;
Glass, EC ;
Turner, RR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (13) :2553-2559