How knowledge drives understanding - matching medical ontologies with the needs of medical language processing

被引:31
作者
Hahn, U
Romacker, M
Schulz, S
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Text Knowledge Engn Lab, Computat Linguist Div, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Freiburg Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
natural language processing; text understanding; description logics; pathology domain;
D O I
10.1016/S0933-3657(98)00044-X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this article, we introduce a knowledge-based approach to medical text understanding. From an in-depth consideration of deep sentence and text understanding we distill basic requirements for an adequate knowledge representation framework. These requirements are then matched with currently available medical ontologies (thesauri, terminologies, etc.). A fundamental trade-off is recognized between large-scale conceptual coverage on the one hand, and formal mechanisms for integrity preservation and conceptual expressiveness on the ether hand. We discuss various shortcomings of the most wide-spread ontologies to capture medical knowledge in-the-large. As a result, we argue for the need of a formally sound and expressive model along the lines of KL-ONE-style terminological representation systems in the format of description logics. These provide an adequate methodology for designing more sophisticated, flexible medical ontologies serving the needs of 'deep' knowledge applications which are by no means restricted to medical language processing. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 51
页数:27
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMPUTATIONAL LEXICO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Lexical Acquisition
[3]  
BAUD RH, 1995, METHOD INFORM MED, V34, P176
[4]  
Biebow B., 1993, Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation. First International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS '93 Proceeding, P75
[5]  
BRAZDIL PB, 1990, FR ART INT, P90
[6]  
BROKER N, 1997, NEW METHODS LANGUAGE, P301
[7]   A Web terminology server using UMLS for the description of medical procedures [J].
Burgun, A ;
Denier, P ;
Bodenreider, O ;
Botti, G ;
Delamarre, D ;
Pouliquen, B ;
Oberlin, P ;
Leveque, JM ;
Lukacs, B ;
Kohler, F ;
Fieschi, M ;
LeBeux, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, 4 (05) :356-363
[8]   Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: Completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity [J].
Campbell, JR ;
Carpenter, P ;
Sneiderman, C ;
Cohn, S ;
Chute, CG ;
Warren, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, 4 (03) :238-251
[9]  
Carenini G., 1994, Seventeenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Patient-Centered Computing, P725
[10]  
Chandrasekaran B., 1989, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, V1, P29, DOI 10.1016/0933-3657(89)90014-6