Strategic paths for biomarker qualification

被引:61
作者
Goodsaid, Federico M. [1 ]
Frueh, Felix W. [1 ]
Mattes, William
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Translat Sci, Off Clin Pharmacol,Genom Grp, Silver Spring, MD 20903 USA
关键词
biomarkers; consortia;
D O I
10.1016/j.tox.2007.12.023
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Biomarkers may be qualified using different qualification processes. A passive approach for qualification has been to accept the end of discussions in the scientific literature as an indication that a biomarker has been accepted. An active approach to qualification requires development of a comprehensive process by which a consensus may be reached about the qualification of a biomarker. Active strategies for qualification include those associated with context-independent as well as context-dependent qualifications. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 223
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] GOODSAID F, UNPUB DRUG DISC TODA
  • [2] GOODSAID F, UNPUB DRUG DISCOV TO
  • [3] Implementing the US FDA Guidance on Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions
    Goodsaid, Federico
    Frueh, Felix W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2007, 48 (05) : 354 - 358
  • [4] Process map proposal for the validation of genomic biomarkers
    Goodsaid, Federico
    Frueh, Felix
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2006, 7 (05) : 773 - 782
  • [5] Biomarker qualification pilot process at the US food and drug administration
    Goodsaid, Federico
    Frueh, Felix
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2007, 9 (01) : E105 - E108
  • [6] Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement
    Lee, JW
    Devanarayan, V
    Barrett, YC
    Weiner, R
    Allinson, J
    Fountain, S
    Keller, S
    Weinryb, I
    Green, M
    Duan, L
    Rogers, JA
    Millham, R
    O'Brien, PJ
    Sailstad, J
    Khan, M
    Ray, C
    Wagner, JA
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 23 (02) : 312 - 328
  • [7] Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: Criteria, validation, strategies
    Lesko, LJ
    Atkinson, AJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 41 : 347 - 366
  • [8] ORR MS, 2007, EXPERIENCE VOLUNTARY
  • [9] The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): A review of the ICCVAM test method evaluation process and current international collaborations with the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)
    Stokes, WS
    Schechtman, LM
    Hill, RN
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2002, 30 : 23 - 32
  • [10] Stokes WS, 2006, ALTEX S, V23, P342