Me, Myself, and (I), (D), or (R)? Partisanship and Political Cognition through the Lens of Implicit Identity

被引:53
作者
Theodoridis, Alexander G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Polit Sci, Merced, CA 95343 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ASSOCIATION TEST; SELF-ESTEEM; PARTY IDENTIFICATION; INDEPENDENT LEANERS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ATTITUDES; BIAS; SOCIALIZATION; STEREOTYPES; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1086/692738
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Novel national survey data (spanning eight years), a parsimonious definition of identity, and a new Implicit Association Test are brought together to examine "implicit party identity" for the first time. This offers the most direct evidence available that voters associate themselves with their party at a visceral level, sometimes in a more or less pronounced way than they realize or report. This pre-introspection, automatic association relates strongly to voter evaluation and interpretation of the political world. Comparisons with standard explicit measures and three key outcomes (affect, differential evaluation, and motivated processing) offer insight regarding the nature, distribution, and measurement of party identification. Explicit and implicit measures largely corroborate each other in distinguishing between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents but deviate in registering partisan intensity. "Leaners" appear closer to partisans than to pure independents, and implicit identity yields a more graduated relationship than explicit party identification with outcomes of political cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1267
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Abrams S.J., 2011, CISE ITANES C
  • [2] Parental socialization and rational party identification
    Achen, CH
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 24 (02) : 151 - 170
  • [3] Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity, and gender attitudes
    Aidman, EV
    Carroll, SM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2003, 17 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [4] Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism
    Amodio, David M.
    Jost, John T.
    Master, Sarah L.
    Yee, Cindy M.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (10) : 1246 - 1247
  • [5] Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters
    Arcuri, Luciano
    Castelli, Luigi
    Galdi, Silvia
    Zogmaister, Cristina
    Amadori, Alessandro
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (03) : 369 - 387
  • [6] Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson 'fail' the implicit association test?"
    Arkes, HR
    Tetlock, PE
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2004, 15 (04) : 257 - 278
  • [7] Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems
    Bankert, Alexa
    Huddy, Leonie
    Rosema, Martin
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (01) : 103 - 132
  • [8] Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions
    Bartels, LM
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 24 (02) : 117 - 150
  • [9] Plausible assumptions, questionable assumptions and post hoc rationalizations: Will the real IAT, please stand up?
    Blanton, Hart
    Jaccard, James
    Christie, Charlene
    Gonzales, Patricia M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (03) : 399 - 409
  • [10] Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT
    Blanton, Hart
    Klick, Jonathan
    Mitchell, Gregory
    Jaccard, James
    Mellers, Barbara
    Tetlock, Philip E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (03) : 567 - 582