Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease

被引:56
作者
Fornara, P
Doehn, C
Friedrich, HJ
Jocham, D
机构
[1] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Urol, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Urol, D-4020 Halle An Der Saale, Germany
关键词
laparoscopy; nephrectomy; renal disease; operative technique; minimal invasive surgery;
D O I
10.1159/000049745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We report the results from a nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with benign renal disease. Methods: From January 1993 to December 1997, 249 nephrectomies for benign renal disease were performed at our institution. There were 118 patients in the open flank nephrectomy group (median age 58.5, range 8-89 years) and 131 patients in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group (median age 40, range 16-73 years). Clinical parameters such as operative times, blood loss, transfusion rates, conversion and complication rates, start of oral intake, analgesic consumption, duration of hospitalization and convalescence and short-term mortality were compared among both groups. Results: Median operative time in the open flank nephrectomy group was 90 (range 30-240) min and also 90 (range 41-210) min in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group. In the laparoscopy group 8 patients were converted to open surgery (6.1 %). There were 27 complications (20.6%) in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group compared to 30 complications (25.4%) in the open flank nephrectomy group. Postoperatively, patients in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group required less morphine sulfate equivalent (12 vs. 20 mg) for pain control and they had a shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 10 days) and convalescence (24 vs. 36 days). The postoperative parameters are given, as medians and reached statistically significant differences in favor of laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions., Laparoscopic nephrectomy results in a significantly briefer postoperative course when compared to open flank nephrectomy. As a matter of fact laparoscopy in urology is still a center-related procedure and even in these centers only a minority of urologists practice laparoscopy. However, in experienced centers the laparoscopic technique should be offered! to patients with, benign renal disease who are scheduled for elective nephrectomy. Copyright (C) 2001 S.Karger AG,Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Nephrectomy - Indications, complications and postoperative mortality in 646 consecutive patients [J].
Beisland, C ;
Medby, PC ;
Sander, S ;
Beisland, HO .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) :58-64
[2]   LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY - INITIAL CASE-REPORT [J].
CLAYMAN, RV ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
SOPER, NJ ;
DIERKS, SM ;
MERETYK, S ;
DARCY, MD ;
ROEMER, FD ;
PINGLETON, ED ;
THOMSON, PG ;
LONG, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (02) :278-282
[3]   BILATERAL-NEPHRECTOMY BEFORE TRANSPLANTATION - INDICATIONS, SURGICAL APPROACH, MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY [J].
DARBY, CR ;
CRANSTON, D ;
RAINE, AEG ;
MORRIS, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (03) :305-307
[4]   Comparison of laparoscopic and open nephroureterectomy for benign disease [J].
Doehn, C ;
Fornara, P ;
Fricke, L ;
Jocham, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :732-734
[5]   Retroperitoneal nephrectomy: Comparison of laparoscopy with open surgery [J].
Doublet, JD ;
Barreto, HS ;
Degremont, AC ;
Gattegno, B ;
Thibault, P .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (06) :713-716
[6]   LAPAROSCOPIC RENAL SURGERY IN CHILDREN [J].
EHRLICH, RM ;
GERSHMAN, A ;
FUCHS, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (03) :735-739
[7]   LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY - MANSOURA EXPERIENCE WITH 106 CASES [J].
ERAKY, I ;
ELKAPPANY, HA ;
GHONEIM, MA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (03) :271-275
[8]   ROLE OF NEPHRECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-FUNCTIONING OR VERY POORLY FUNCTIONING UNILATERAL TUBERCULOUS KIDNEY [J].
FLECHNER, SM ;
GOW, JG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 123 (06) :822-825
[9]   Laparoscopy in renal transplant patients [J].
Fornara, P ;
Doehn, C ;
Fricke, L ;
Hoyer, J ;
Jocham, D .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) :521-527
[10]   Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive? [J].
Fornara, P ;
Doehn, C ;
Seyfarth, M ;
Jocham, D .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (03) :241-250