Distributed Transactive Energy Trading Framework in Distribution Networks

被引:284
作者
Li, Jiayong [1 ]
Zhang, Chaorui [2 ]
Xu, Zhao [1 ]
Wang, Jianhui [3 ]
Zhao, Jian [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Ying-Jun Angela [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Informat Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Dallas, TX 75205 USA
[4] Shanghai Univ Elect Power, Dept Elect Power Engn, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Transactive energy; bilateral energy trading; distribution networks; photovoltaic system; Nash bargaining; alternating direction method of multipliers; distributed algorithm; POWER;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2854649
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
080906 [电磁信息功能材料与结构]; 082806 [农业信息与电气工程];
摘要
In this paper, we propose a novel transactive energy trading (TET) framework to deal with the economic issues in energy trading and the technical issues in distribution system operation in a holistic manner. In particular, we innovatively integrate a bilateral energy trading mechanism with the optimal power flow (OPF) technique to increase economic benefits to individual participants, and meanwhile ensure the reliability and security of the system operation. In order to resolve the inherent conflict of interests, Nash bargaining theory is used to model the TET problem, which is further decomposed into a multiperiod OPF problem and a payment bargaining problem. Moreover, we develop an efficient distributed algorithm for solving the TET problem base on alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). Instead of directly solving optimization subproblems like most ADMM-based distributed algorithms, we derive closed-form solutions to all subproblems to significantly improve the computational efficiency. Finally, numerical tests on the IEEE 37-bus and 123-bus distribution systems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework and the efficiency of our distributed algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:7215 / 7227
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Akter MN., 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741099, 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741099]
[2]
Transmission expansion planning: A mixed-integer LP approach [J].
Alguacil, N ;
Motto, AL ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (03) :1070-1077
[3]
Ambrosio Ron, 2016, IEEE Electrification Magazine, V4, P4, DOI 10.1109/MELE.2016.2614234
[4]
[Anonymous], FOUND TRENDS MACH LE
[5]
[Anonymous], N AM POW S NAPS 2016
[6]
D. T. F. W. Group, 2010, DISTR TEST FEED
[7]
Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification-Part I [J].
Farivar, Masoud ;
Low, Steven H. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (03) :2554-2564
[8]
Decentralized Short-Term Voltage Control in Active Power Distribution Systems [J].
Feng, Changsen ;
Li, Zhiyi ;
Shahidehpour, Mohammad ;
Wen, Fushuan ;
Liu, Weijia ;
Wang, Xiaolei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (05) :4566-4576
[9]
Distributed Energy Trading: The Multiple-Microgrid Case [J].
Gregoratti, David ;
Matamoros, Javier .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2015, 62 (04) :2551-2559
[10]
Transactive Control of Commercial Buildings for Demand Response [J].
Hao, He ;
Corbin, Charles D. ;
Kalsi, Karanjit ;
Pratt, Robert G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (01) :774-783