Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges

被引:96
作者
du Pont, Yann Robiou [1 ]
Meinshausen, Malte [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Australian German Climate & Energy Coll, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CARBON-CYCLE MODELS; ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN; SIMPLER MODEL; CLIMATE; TARGETS; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-018-07223-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Under the bottom-up architecture of the Paris Agreement, countries pledge Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Current NDCs individually align, at best, with divergent concepts of equity and are collectively inconsistent with the Paris Agreement. We show that the global 2030-emissions of NDCs match the sum of each country adopting the least-stringent of five effort-sharing allocations of a well-below 2 degrees C-scenario. Extending such a self-interested bottom-up aggregation of equity might lead to a median 2100-warming of 2.3 degrees C. Tightening the warming goal of each country's effort-sharing approach to aspirational levels of 1.1 degrees C and 1.3 degrees C could achieve the 1.5 degrees C and well-below 2 degrees C-thresholds, respectively. This new hybrid allocation reconciles the bottom-up nature of the Paris Agreement with its top-down warming thresholds and provides a temperature metric to assess NDCs. When taken as benchmark by other countries, the NDCs of India, the EU, the USA and China lead to 2.6 degrees C, 3.2 degrees C, 4 degrees C and over 5.1 degrees C warmings, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change
    Althor, Glenn
    Watson, James E. M.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy
  • [3] [Anonymous], INDC FACTSHEETS
  • [4] Arneson R., 2013, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • [5] Averchenkova A., 2014, TAMING BEASTS BURDEN
  • [6] Greenhouse Development Rights: towards an equitable framework for global climate policy
    Baer, Paul
    Fieldman, Glenn
    Athanasiou, Tom
    Kartha, Sivan
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2008, 21 (04) : 649 - 669
  • [7] THE PARIS CLIMATE CHANGE AGREEMENT: A NEW HOPE?
    Bodansky, Daniel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2016, 110 (02) : 288 - 319
  • [8] Caney S, 2009, J GLOB ETHICS, V5, P125, DOI [10.1080/17449620903110300, DOI 10.1080/17449620903110300]
  • [9] Clarke L, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P413
  • [10] The Triptych approach revisited:: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation
    den Elzen, Michel
    Hoehne, Niklas
    Moltmann, Sara
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (03) : 1107 - 1124