Reciprocal altruism under conditions of partner selection

被引:21
作者
de Vos, H [1 ]
Smaniotto, R [1 ]
Elsas, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, ICS, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
commitment; evolutionary game theory; partner selection; reciprocal altruism; simulation;
D O I
10.1177/104346301013002001
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This paper is a contribution to solving the problem of whether reciprocal altruism can emerge and maintain itself in a population of selfish individuals. We use an evolutionary game theoretic simulation model (the Social Evolution Model) to investigate the relative fitness of two versions of a reciprocal altruistic trait competing with a defecting trait. One main difference between the Social Evolution Model and most of the models that are known in this field is that partner selection is straightforwardly built into the strategies of the players. In most of the models in the literature, partner selection is not an Option in the game. Because of this element of forced play, much attention is given to the ability of strategies to detect cheaters and to retaliate. We show that modeling partner selection points to disadvantages of a preoccupation with cheater-detection and to the importance of committing oneself to a partner.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 183
页数:45
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATURE KNOWLEDGE CON
[2]  
Axelrod R, 2006, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[3]  
BALU PM, 1989, EXCHANGE POWER SOCIA
[4]  
Boorman S.A., 1980, GENETICS ALTRUISM
[5]  
Bowlby J., 1973, Attachment and loss: Volume 2. Separation, V2
[6]   THE EVOLUTION OF RECIPROCITY IN SIZABLE GROUPS [J].
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1988, 132 (03) :337-356
[7]  
Boyd R., 1985, CULTURE EVOLUTIONARY
[8]   COPING WITH RISK - RECIPROCITY AMONG THE BASARWA OF NORTHERN BOTSWANA [J].
CASHDAN, EA .
MAN, 1985, 20 (03) :454-474
[9]  
COHEN S, 1985, PSYCHOL BULL, V98, P310, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.98.2.310
[10]  
COLL M, 1991, RATION SOC, V3, P35