Managing ammonia emissions from livestock production in Europe

被引:178
作者
Webb, J
Menzi, H
Pain, BF
Misselbrook, TH
Dämmgen, U
Hendriks, H
Döhler, H
机构
[1] ADAS Res, Wolverhampton WV6 8TQ, England
[2] Swiss Coll Agr, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
[3] Inst Grassland & Environm Res, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
[4] Fed Agr Res Ctr, Inst Agroecol, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[5] Minist Agr Nat & Food Qual, Natl Reference Ctr, Ede, Netherlands
[6] KTBL, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
ammonia; livestock manure; abatement; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2004.11.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Around 75% of European ammonia (NH3) emissions come from livestock production. Emissions occur at all stages of manure management: from buildings housing livestock; during manure storage; following manure application to land; and from urine deposited by livestock on pastures during grazing. Ammoniacal nitrogen (total ammoniacal-nitrogen, TAN) in livestock excreta is the main source of NH3. At each stage of manure management TAN may be lost, mainly as NH3, and the remainder passed to the next stage. Hence, measures to reduce NH3 emissions at the various stages of manure management are interdependent, and the accumulative reduction achieved by combinations of measures is not simply additive. This TAN-flow concept enables rapid and easy estimation of the consequences of NH3 abatement at one stage of manure management (upstream) on NH3 emissions at later stages (downstream), and gives unbiased assessment of the most cost-effective measures. We conclude that rapid incorporation of manures into arable land is one of the most cost-effective measures to reduce NH3 emissions, while covering manure stores and applying slurry by band spreader or injection are more cost-effective than measures to reduce emissions from buildings. These measures are likely to rank highly in most European countries. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 406
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] ANDERSON N, ENV INT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, 62 ECETOC
  • [3] [Anonymous], RESTRICTING AMMONIA
  • [4] Balsdon S.L., 2002, P 10 INT C RAMIRAN N, P291
  • [5] Critical loads and the relevance of ammonia to an effects-based nitrogen Protocol
    Bull, KR
    Sutton, MA
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (03) : 565 - 572
  • [6] Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing-finishing pigs
    Canh, TT
    Aarnink, AJA
    Schutte, JB
    Sutton, A
    Langhout, DJ
    Verstegen, MWA
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1998, 56 (03): : 181 - 191
  • [7] Cost-effective strategies for the abatement of ammonia emissions from European agriculture
    Cowell, DA
    Apsimon, HM
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (03) : 573 - 580
  • [8] Dämmgen U, 2002, LANDBAUFORSCH VOLK, V52, P19
  • [9] Effect of dietary protein content, litter and drinker type on ammonia emission from broiler houses
    Elwinger, K
    Svensson, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1996, 64 (03): : 197 - 208
  • [10] Reduction of ammonia emission by shallow slurry injection: Injection efficiency and additional energy demand
    Hansen, MN
    Sommer, SG
    Madsen, NP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2003, 32 (03) : 1099 - 1104