Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in a community hospital

被引:38
作者
Chan, I
Bicknell, SG
Graham, M
机构
[1] Lions Gate Hosp, Dept Radiol, N Vancouver, BC V7L 2L7, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841809
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility and accuracy of sonography in diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a general community hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All reports relating to appendicitis were retrospectively obtained from archived transcription reports of nine radiologists from a geographically constrained hospital between December 1999 and December 2003 by a search on the keyword "appendicitis." These files were correlated with the histopathology reports from surgical appendectomy or findings from clinical follow-up during the same period. A survey eliciting the views of five local surgeons on the utility of sonography for the detection of acute appendicitis was also collected. RESULTS. Sonography reports for 667 patients (mean age, 34 years; range, 6-93 years) were obtained. Of these, a total of 174 had pathologically proven appendicitis and 145 had positive findings for appendicitis on sonography. The accuracy was 92%; sensitivity, 83%; and specificity, 95%. The positive predictive value was 86%, and the negative predictive value was 94%. Three of the five surveyed surgeons indicated they used sonography less than 25% of the time, with none using it more than 75%. CONCLUSION. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predicative values of sonography performed by general radiologists in a community hospital are comparable to statistics quoted in the literature for academic institutions. The most common error was the tendency to misclassify appendixes under 6 mm. Most surgeons surveyed stated their use of sonography would increase if sonography yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 85% or greater.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1812
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
BIRNBAUM, BA ;
YEE, J ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
ROSHKOW, J ;
GRAY, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) :31-35
[2]   Appendicitis at the millennium [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :337-348
[3]   SONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF PERFORATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
BORUSHOK, KF ;
JEFFREY, RB ;
LAING, FC ;
TOWNSEND, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (02) :275-278
[4]   Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: Frequency and natural history in 60 patients [J].
Cobben, LPJ ;
Van Otterloo, AD ;
Puylaert, JBCM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :349-352
[5]   Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis:: Results of a prospective multicenter trial [J].
Franke, C ;
Böhner, H ;
Yang, Q ;
Ohmann, C ;
Röher, HD .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (02) :141-146
[6]  
Himeno Shinji, 2003, Tokai J Exp Clin Med, V28, P39
[7]   APPENDICITIS DIAGNOSIS TODAY - CLINICAL AND ULTRASONIC DEDUCTIONS [J].
JOHN, H ;
NEFF, U ;
KELEMEN, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 17 (02) :243-249
[8]   Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years [J].
Jones, PF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (12) :1570-1577
[9]   Appendicitis: Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings [J].
Kessler, N ;
Cyteval, C ;
Gallix, B ;
Lesnik, A ;
Blayac, PM ;
Pujol, J ;
Bruel, JM ;
Taourel, P .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :472-478
[10]   Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis [J].
Lee, SL ;
Walsh, AJ ;
Ho, HS .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (05) :556-561