Effect of Active Head Restraint on Residual Neck Instability due to Rear Impact

被引:7
作者
Ivancic, Paul C. [1 ]
Sha, Daohang [2 ]
Lawrence, Brandon D. [1 ]
Mo, Fred [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Biomech Res Lab, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
whiplash; residual instability; active head restraint; biomechanics; cervical spine; WHIPLASH INJURY; CERVICAL-SPINE; PROTECTION; POSITION; WHIPS; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d04d2b
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. An in vitro study of simulated whiplash using a hybrid cadaveric/surrogate model. Objective. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of the active head restraint (AHR) on residual neck instability due to simulated rear impacts of a human model of the neck. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have indicated potential benefits of active injury prevention systems in reducing neck injuries during rear impacts. Methods. Six osteoligamentous whole cervical spine specimens (occiput-T1) were prepared with vertebral motion tracking flags. The model, consisting of the neck specimen mounted to the torso of BioRID II and carrying an anthropometric surrogate head, was rear impacted (7.1 and 11.1 g) with and without the AHR. Pre- and post-impact flexibility tests identified significant residual instability (P < 0.05) above physiologic values and among experimental conditions. Linear regression analyses were used to identify correlation between spinal rotation peaks measured during impact and the resulting flexibility parameter increases (R(2) > 0.35 and P < 0.001). Results. Our results indicated significant increases in the average flexibility parameters, up to 3.1 degrees, at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C5-C6 due to 7.1 g rear impacts even in the presence of the AHR. Subsequently, increases in the flexibility parameters progressed and spread to head/C1 and to the inferior spinal levels following the 11.1 g impacts. Correlation was observed between the C7-T1 extension peaks measured during impact and the flexibility parameter increases measured following impact. The flexibility parameter increases were generally larger due to the impacts with no head restraint, as compared with the AHR. Conclusion. Extrapolation of our results indicated that every 1 of extension beyond the physiologic limit during whiplash contributed approximately 0.5 degrees of residual neck rotation following whiplash. The present data underscore the protective effect of the AHR in reducing residual neck instability due to whiplash.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2078
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Neck pain and head restraint position relative to the driver's head in rear-end collisions [J].
Chapline, JF ;
Ferguson, SA ;
Lillis, RP ;
Lund, AK ;
Williams, AF .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2000, 32 (02) :287-297
[2]
Farmer Charles M, 2003, Traffic Inj Prev, V4, P83, DOI 10.1080/15389580309867
[3]
Geigl B.C., 1994, PROCEEDING INT C BIO, P127
[4]
GEIGL BC, 1995, INT RES C BIOM IMP L, P261
[5]
Soft tissue injury threshold during simulated whiplash - A biomechanical investigation [J].
Ito, S ;
Ivanvic, PC ;
Panjabi, MM ;
Cunningham, BW .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (09) :979-987
[6]
Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation [J].
Ivancic, P ;
Panjabi, MM ;
Ito, S ;
Cripton, PA ;
Wang, JL .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (04) :346-355
[7]
Ivancic Paul C, 2006, Traffic Inj Prev, V7, P389, DOI 10.1080/15389580600789127
[8]
WHIPS - Volvo's whiplash protection study [J].
Jakobsson, L ;
Lundell, B ;
Norin, H ;
Isaksson-Hellman, I .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2000, 32 (02) :307-319
[9]
WHIPS (Volvo Cars' Whiplash Protection System)-The Development and Real-World Performance [J].
Jakobsson, Lotta ;
Isaksson-Hellman, Irene ;
Lindman, Magdalena .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2008, 9 (06) :600-605
[10]
Qualitative analysis of neck kinematics during low-speed rear-end impact [J].
Luan, F ;
Yang, KH ;
Deng, B ;
Begeman, PC ;
Tashman, S ;
King, AI .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (09) :649-657