Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated, communication and intergroup interaction

被引:109
作者
Douglas, KM [1 ]
McGarty, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1348/014466601164894
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research investigated the intergroup properties of hostile 'flaming' behaviour in computer-mediated communication and how flaming language is affected by Internet identifiability, or identifiability by name and e-mail address/geographical location as is common to Internet communication. According to the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE; e.g. Reicher, Spears: & Postmes, 1995) there may be strategic reasons for identifiable groups members to act in a more group-normative manner in the presence of an audience, to gain acceptance from the in-group, to avoid punishment from the out-group, or to assert their identity to the out-group. For these reasons, it was predicted that communicators would produce more stereo type-consistent (group-normative) descriptions of out-group members' behaviours when their descriptions were identifiable to an audience. In one archival and three experimental studies, it was found that identifiability to an in-group audience was associated with higher levels of stereotype-consistent language when communicators described anonymous out-group targets. These results extend SIDE and suggest the importance of an in-group audience for the expression of stereotypical views.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 416
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, INT J BUS COMMUN
[2]  
[Anonymous], MS MAGAZINE
[3]   LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS AND IMPLICIT ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
ARCURI, L ;
MAASS, A ;
PORTELLI, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 32 :277-285
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group [J].
Barreto, M ;
Ellemers, N .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (08) :891-906
[6]  
Brewer M.B., 1988, A dual process model of impression formation, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
[7]  
CHESTER A, 1996, MED ETHN CONFL C MEL
[8]  
DIENER E, 1980, PSYCHOL GROUP INFLUE, P1160
[9]  
DOUGLAS KM, IN PRESS GROUP DYNAM
[10]  
Duval S., 1972, THEORY OBJECTIVE SEL