Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil

被引:113
作者
Seabra, Joaquim E. A. [1 ]
Macedo, Isaias C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Engn Mecan, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] UN1CAMP, Interdisciplinary Ctr Energy Planning NIPE, BR-13084971 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Cellulosic ethanol; Bioelectricity; CHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This work compares the technical, economic and environmental (GHG emissions mitigation) performance of power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass, considering conversion plants adjacent to a sugarcane mill in Brazil. Systems performances were simulated for a projected enzymatic saccharification co-fermentation plant (Ethanol option) and for a commercial steam-Rankine power plant (Electricity option). Surplus bagasse from the mill would be used as fuel/raw material for conversion, while cane trash collected from the field would be used as supplementary fuel at the mill. For the Electricity option, the sugarcane biorefinery (mill + adjacent plant) would produce 91 L of ethanol per tonne of cane and export 130 kWh/t of cane, while for the Ethanol option the total ethanol production would be 124 L/t of cane with an electricity surplus of 50 kWh/t cane. The return on investment (ROI) related to the biochemical conversion route was 15.9%, compared with 23.2% for the power plant, for the conditions in Brazil. Considering the GHG emissions mitigation, the environmentally preferred option is the biochemical conversion route: the net avoided emissions associated to the adjacent plants are estimated to be 493 and 781 kgCO(2)eq/t of dry bagasse for the Electricity and Ethanol options, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 428
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abiquim, 2008, IND QUIM RED EM GAS
[2]  
[Anonymous], PLAN DEC EXP EN 2008
[3]  
[Anonymous], IMPACTS LAND USE GHG
[4]  
[Anonymous], TP51032438 NAT REN E
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, DED IND BAS
[6]  
BNDES CGEE, 2008, SUG BAS ETH EN SUST
[7]   A comparison of the environmental benefits of bagasse-derived electricity and fuel ethanol on a life-cycle basis [J].
Botha, Tyron ;
von Blottnitz, Harro .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) :2654-2661
[8]  
Castro N.J., 2010, ETANOL BIOELETRICIDA, P2010
[9]  
EPE, 2008, EPEDEEDEN0672008R4
[10]  
EPE-. Empresa de Pesquisa Energetica, 2010, PLAN DEC EXP EN 2019