Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expected

被引:43
作者
Freidlin, Boris
Korn, Edward L.
George, Stephen L.
Gray, Robert
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Treatment & Diagnosis, Biomet Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Canc Leukemia Grp B Stat Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Eastern Cooperat Oncol Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8711
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The randomized clinical trial (RCT) is the gold standard for definitive evaluation of new therapies. RCTs designed to show that the therapeutic efficacy of a new therapy is not unacceptably inferior to that of standard therapy are called noninferiority trials. Traditionally, noninferiority trials have required very large sample sizes. Sometimes, a new treatment regimen with a favorable toxicity and/or tolerability profile is also expected to have some modest improvement in efficacy. In such specialized settings we describe a hybrid trial-design approach that requires a dramatically smaller sample size than that of a standard noninferiority design. This hybrid design can naturally incorporate a formal test of superiority as well as noninferiority.
引用
收藏
页码:5019 / 5023
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues - the encounters of academic consultants in statistics [J].
D'Agostino, RB ;
Massaro, JM ;
Sullivan, LM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (02) :169-186
[2]  
Dunnett CW, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1729
[3]   Open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase III study comparing oral topotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as treatment for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer [J].
Eckardt, JR ;
von Pawel, J ;
Papai, Z ;
Tomova, A ;
Tzekova, V ;
Crofts, TE ;
Brannon, S ;
Wissel, P ;
Ross, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :2044-2051
[4]  
European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, 2000, EMEA POINTS CONS SWI
[5]  
FLEMING TR, 2007, CURRENT ISSUES NONIN
[6]   Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The TAX 326 study group [J].
Fossella, F ;
Pereira, JR ;
von Pawel, J ;
Pluzanska, A ;
Gorbounova, V ;
Kaukel, E ;
Mattson, KV ;
Ramlau, R ;
Szczesna, A ;
Fidias, P ;
Millward, M ;
Belani, CP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (16) :3016-3024
[7]   Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer [J].
Gradishar, WJ ;
Tjulandin, S ;
Davidson, N ;
Shaw, H ;
Desai, N ;
Bhar, P ;
Hawkins, M ;
O'Shaughnessy, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (31) :7794-7803
[8]   Claims of equivalence in medical research: Are they supported by the evidence? [J].
Greene, WL ;
Concato, J ;
Feinstein, AR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (09) :715-722
[9]   Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy [J].
Hanna, N ;
Shepherd, FA ;
Fossella, FV ;
Pereira, JR ;
De Marinis, F ;
von Pawel, J ;
Gatzemeier, U ;
Tsao, TCY ;
Pless, M ;
Muller, T ;
Lim, HL ;
Desch, C ;
Szondy, K ;
Gervais, R ;
Shaharyar ;
Manegold, C ;
Paul, S ;
Paoletti, P ;
Einhorn, L ;
Bunn, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) :1589-1597
[10]   Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment [J].
Howell, A ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Albano, JQ ;
Aschermannova, A ;
Mauriac, L ;
Kleeberg, UR ;
Vergote, I ;
Erikstein, B ;
Webster, A ;
Morris, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (16) :3396-3403