Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:188
作者
Markar, S. R. [1 ]
Karthikesalingam, A. [2 ]
Thrumurthy, S. [2 ]
Muirhead, L. [1 ]
Kinross, J. [1 ]
Paraskeva, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Acad Surg Unit, London W2 1NY, England
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, London, England
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2012年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词
Pancreatobilio; Cancer; Cholecystectomy; SILS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; STANDARD; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained increasing attention due to the potential to maximize the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to compare clinical outcome following SILS and standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallstone-related disease. An electronic search of Embase and Medline databases for articles from 1966 to 2011 was performed. Publications were included if they were randomised controlled studies in which patients underwent either single-incision or multiport cholecystectomy. The primary outcome measures for the meta-analysis were postoperative complications and postoperative pain score [visual analogue scale (VAS) on the day of surgery]. Secondary outcome measures were operating time and length of hospital stay. Weighted mean difference was calculated for the effect size of SILS on continuous variables, and pooled odds ratios were calculated for discrete variables. In total, 375 cholecystectomy operations from 7 randomised controlled trials were included, 195 by single-incision (SILS) and 180 by conventional multiport. Operating time was significantly longer in the SILS group compared to the standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (weighted mean difference = 2.13; P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative pain score (VAS), or the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for the treatment of uncomplicated gallstone disease, with postoperative outcome similar to that of standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Future high-powered randomized studies should be focused on elucidating subtle differences in postoperative complications, reported postoperative pain, and cosmesis following SILS cholecystectomy in more severe biliary disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1213
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review [J].
Antoniou, Stavros A. ;
Pointner, Rudolph ;
Granderath, Frank A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (02) :367-377
[2]
Laparoendoscopic Single Site (LESS) Versus Classic Video-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study [J].
Aprea, Giovanni ;
Bottazzi, Enrico Coppola ;
Guida, Francesco ;
Masone, Stefania ;
Persico, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 166 (02) :E109-E112
[3]
Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain [J].
Asakuma, M. ;
Hayashi, M. ;
Komeda, K. ;
Shimizu, T. ;
Hirokawa, F. ;
Miyamoto, Y. ;
Okuda, J. ;
Tanigawa, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (07) :991-995
[4]
The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bittner, R .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 389 (03) :157-163
[5]
A Case-control Study of Single-Incision Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J].
Chang, Stephen Kin Yong ;
Tay, Chee Wei ;
Bicol, Ralph Allan ;
Lee, Yang Yang ;
Madhavan, Krishnakumar .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (02) :289-293
[6]
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Cholecystectomy A Retrospective Comparison With 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J].
Chow, Andre ;
Purkayastha, Sanjay ;
Aziz, Omer ;
Pefanis, Dina ;
Paraskeva, Paraskevas .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (12) :1187-1191
[7]
METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]
A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Fronza, Jeffrey S. ;
Linn, John G. ;
Nagle, Alexander P. ;
Soper, Nathaniel J. .
SURGERY, 2010, 148 (04) :731-734
[9]
Kaiser A M, 2001, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V10, P483
[10]
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis [J].
Keus, F. ;
de Jong, J. A. F. ;
Gooszen, H. G. ;
van Laarhoven, C. J. H. M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04)