On the modelling of the particle dynamics in electro-hydrodvnamic flow fields: II. Influences of inhomogeneities on electrostatic precipitation

被引:25
作者
Schmid, HJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Particle Technol, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
EHD; electric field; electrostatic precipitation; modelling; turbulence;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.010
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A simulation method is applied to calculate particle dynamics in electrostatic precipitators as characterised by particle flux density and concentration profiles in arbitrary channel cross-sections and flux density profiles of dust precipitated at the collecting electrodes (CEs). A simple statistical model allows the determination of confidence intervals for flux profiles. First, a 'standard case' considering full coupling of all physical phenomena occurring in this problem, i.e., electric field, flow field and particle dynamics is simulated. Subsequently, this standard case is compared to simulations with one quantity (e.g., electric field strength, turbulence intensity) substituted by a mean value which is homogeneously distributed in the precipitation zone. This reveals the relevance of the various physical phenomena: It turned out that the secondary flows had only a minor influence on the overall particle precipitation although they cause some 'patterning' of local precipitation. Turbulence inhomogeneity shows a stronger effect on particle dynamics. However, the electric field appears to be by far the most important quantity in simulating particle dynamics. Consequently, in order to achieve most reasonable simulation results for a given numerical effort most attention has to be devoted to field calculations, including correct boundary conditions. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 149
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   ASSESSMENT OF CORONA MODELS BASED ON THE DEUTSCH APPROXIMATION [J].
BOUZIANE, A ;
HIDAKA, K ;
TAPLAMACIOGLU, MC ;
WATERS, RT .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1994, 27 (02) :320-329
[2]  
ENGEL A, 1984, WAHRSCHEINLICHKEITSR, V1
[3]   How many particles for my Lagrangian simulations? [J].
Graham, DI ;
Moyeed, RA .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 125 (2-3) :179-186
[4]  
MEROTH AM, 1997, NUMERICAL ELECTROHYD
[5]   NUMERICAL FIELD CALCULATION IN ELECTROFILTERS WITH RESPECT TO EQUIVALENT ELECTRICAL OPERATING-CONDITIONS [J].
MILLER, J ;
RIEHLE, C ;
SCHWAB, AJ ;
LOFFLER, F .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 1994, 33 (02) :213-228
[6]   On measuring and modeling local average particle velocities for particle ensembles in classifying systems [J].
Riehle, C .
PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 1995, 12 (06) :299-303
[7]   On the modelling of the particle dynamics in electro-hydrodynamic flow-fields: I. Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian modelling approach [J].
Schmid, HJ ;
Vogel, L .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 135 :118-135
[8]   On the modelling of the electro-hydrodynamic flow field in electrostatic precipitators [J].
Schmid, HJ ;
Stolz, S ;
Buggisch, H .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2002, 68 (01) :63-89
[9]  
Schmid HJ, 2002, PART PART SYST CHAR, V19, P203, DOI 10.1002/1521-4117(200207)19:3<203::AID-PPSC203>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-7