Criterion to evaluate the "twofold benefit" of the renovation of buildings and their elements

被引:55
作者
Martinaitis, V [1 ]
Rogoza, A
Bikmaniene, I
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Heating & Ventilat, LT-2040 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] AJSC Eksergija, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
energy efficiency in buildings; cost of conserved energy; deterioration of building's elements; twofold benefit of building's renovation;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00054-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
At present a benefit of energy saving projects for buildings renovation is considered as only the saving of energy. It is obvious, however, that most energy saving measures allow one not only to save energy, but also to improve the building's condition and in turn to increase the value of a building. In practice, considering only the reduction of energy cost, the implementation of such measures is usually hard to prove through cost effectiveness. The authors of this paper suggest one of possible methods of how the assessment of the cost effectiveness of energy saving measures could include a twofold benefit of building's renovation-the energy saving and the rehabilitation of the buildings elements physical condition. The presented method could form a "new attitude" towards the assessment of the energy saving projects for buildings renovation. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Lithuanian energy efficiency project [J].
Kazakevicius, E ;
Vitkauskas, A ;
Mikkelsen, SE .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (07) :621-627
[2]  
MARTINAITIS V, 2001, SCI J VILNIUS GEDIMI, V7, P73
[3]  
MARTINAITIS V, 2000, METHODOLOGY CONSTRUC
[4]  
MEIER A, 1983, HEAT-PIPING-AIR COND, V55, P73
[5]  
Meier A., 1983, SUPPLYING ENERGY GRE
[6]  
*MIN ED SCI REP LI, 2001, SHORT TERM CONS REV
[7]  
*MIN ED SCI REP LI, 2000, SHORT TERM CONS DEV
[8]  
Stoft SE, 1995, ENERGY J, V16, P109
[9]  
WIJFWINKEL WP, 2000, P 4 INT C VILN LITH, P199
[10]  
1989, OFFICIAL J L 0211, V40