Interpreting change on the WAIS-III/WMS-III in clinical samples

被引:163
作者
Iverson, GL
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada
[2] Riverview Hosp, Neuropsychiat Unit, Essondale, BC V0M 1J0, Canada
关键词
WAIS-III; WMS-III; clinical samples;
D O I
10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00060-3
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Clinicians should note that there is considerable variability in the reliabilities of the index and subtest scores derived from the third editions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) and the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III). The purpose of this article is to review these reliabilites and to illustrate how they can be used to interpret change in patients' performances from test to retest. The WAIS-III IQ and Index scores are consistently the most reliable scores, in terms of both internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The most internally consistent WAIS-III subtests are Vocabulary, Information, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, and Arithmetic. Information and Vocabulary have the highest test-retest reliability On the WMS-III, the Auditory Immediate Index, Immediate Memory Index, Auditory Delayed Index, and General Memory Index are the most reliable, in terms of both internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Logical Memory I and Verbal Paired Associates I subtests are the most reliable. Data from three clinical groups (i.e., Alzheimer's disease, chronic alcohol abuse, and schizophrenia) were extracted from the Technical Manual [Psychological Corporation (1997). WAIS-III/WMS-III Technical Manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace] for the purpose of calculating reliable change estimates. A table of confidence intervals for test-retest measurement error is provided to help the clinician determine if patients have reliably improved or deteriorated on follow-up testing. (C) 2001 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 191
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Chelune G.J., 1993, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V7, P41, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.41, 10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.41, https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.41]
[2]  
Iverson GL, 1998, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V13, P661, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(1998100)13:10<661::AID-GPS838>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-0
[4]   CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE - A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO DEFINING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY-RESEARCH [J].
JACOBSON, NS ;
TRUAX, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (01) :12-19
[5]   CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE - JACOBSON AND TRUAX (1991) REVISITED [J].
SPEER, DC .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (03) :402-408
[6]  
Tulsky D., 1997, WAIS III WMS 3 TECHN