The limits of equality: Insights from the Israeli kibbutz

被引:58
作者
Abramitzky, Ran [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1111
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
What limits the capacity of society to redistribute? What determines the structure of compensation in organizations striving for income equality? This paper addresses these questions by investigating the economic and sociological forces underlying the persistence of the Israeli kibbutzim, communities based on the principle of income equality. To do this, I exploit newly assembled data on kibbutzim and a financial crisis in the late 1980s that affected them differentially. The main findings are that (1) productive individuals are the most likely to exit and a kibbutz's wealth serves as a lock-in device that increases the value of staying; (2) higher wealth reduces exit and supports a high degree of income equality; and (3) ideology facilitates income equality. Using a simple model, I show that these findings are consistent with a view of the kibbutz as providing optimal insurance when members have the option of leaving. More generally, these findings contribute to an understanding of how mobility limits redistribution, and to an understanding of the determinants of the sharing rule in other types of organizations, such as professional partnerships, cooperatives, and labor-managed firms.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1159
页数:49
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Abramitzky Ran, 2008, TESTING SELF SELECTI
[2]   Limited commitment and crowding out of private transfers: Evidence from a randomised experiment [J].
Albarran, P ;
Attanasio, OP .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2003, 113 (486) :C77-C85
[3]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KIBBUTZ ERA CHANGE
[5]  
BARKAI H, 1986, EC Q, V129, P666
[6]  
BARKAI H, 1977, GROWTH PATTERNS KIBB
[8]   RECIPROCITY WITHOUT COMMITMENT - CHARACTERIZATION AND PERFORMANCE OF INFORMAL INSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS [J].
COATE, S ;
RAVALLION, M .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1993, 40 (01) :1-24
[9]  
CRAIG B, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P1083
[10]  
Cremer H, 2004, HDB REGIONAL URBAN E