A comparison of 'Early' and 'Late' stage brain activation during brief practice of a simple motor task

被引:38
作者
Tracy, JI
Faro, SS
Mohammed, F
Pinus, A
Christensen, H
Burkland, D
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Med Coll Penn & Hahnemann Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2001年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
motor performance; functional magnetic resonance imaging; practice;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00045-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This research study addresses the question: does the neural circuit implementing a motor task undergo change as a function of even limited practice.! To detect potential neural changes associated with limited practice we compared brain activation at the early and late stages of motor performance on a simple task over one relatively brief session. Single-finger opposition served as cognitive stimulation during collection of BOLD fMRI signal. We predicted prefrontal cortex activation would be prominent early, with basal ganglia activation becoming prominent during late stage performance. Results revealed that both early and late performance involve areas in the cerebellum, prefrontal, mid-temporal, extrastriate, and parietal cortices, but that the particular regions within these broad areas differed for the two points of performance. The strongest dissociation between early and late performance involved the corpus striatum, thalamus, and cingulate gyrus. The findings suggested the neural circuit implementing this simple task varied over a relatively brief window of practice. Implications for defining the neurocognitive function of the structures involved, particularly the cerebellum, are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 316
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES [J].
BEATTY, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) :276-292
[3]  
BURNOD Y, 1991, BRAIN SPACE, P446
[4]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[5]   RCBF LANDSCAPES DURING MOTOR-PERFORMANCE AND MOTOR IDEATION OF A GRAPHIC GESTURE [J].
DECETY, J ;
PHILIPPON, B ;
INGVAR, DH .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1988, 238 (01) :33-38
[6]  
Dempster F. N., 1996, MEMORY, P317, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50011-2
[7]   Skill learning [J].
Doyon, J .
CEREBELLUM AND COGNITION, 1997, 41 :273-294
[8]   Functional anatomy of visuomotor skill learning in human subjects examined with positron emission tomography [J].
Doyon, J ;
Owen, AM ;
Petrides, M ;
Sziklas, V ;
Evans, AC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (04) :637-648
[9]   SPATIAL PATTERNS OF FUNCTIONAL ACTIVATION OF THE CEREBELLUM INVESTIGATED USING HIGH-FIELD (4 T) MRI [J].
ELLERMAN, JM ;
FLAMENT, D ;
KIM, SG ;
FU, QG ;
MERKLE, H ;
EBNER, TJ ;
UGURBIL, K .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 7 (1-2) :63-68
[10]  
Flament D., 1994, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V20, P20