High Rates of Tumor Growth and Disease Progression Detected on Serial Pretreatment Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scans in Radical Radiotherapy Candidates With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

被引:67
作者
Everitt, Sarah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herschtal, Alan [4 ]
Callahan, Jason [5 ]
Plumridge, Nikki [1 ,6 ]
Ball, David [1 ,6 ]
Kron, Tomas [3 ,7 ]
Schneider-Kolsky, Michal [3 ]
Binns, David [5 ]
Hicks, Rodney J. [5 ,6 ]
MacManus, Michael [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Radiat Therapy Serv, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiat Sci, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Ctr Biostat & Clin Trials, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[5] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Ctr Mol Imaging, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Dept Phys Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
disease progression; lung cancer; radiotherapy; waiting time; tumor volume doubling time; fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; PET; METASTASES; DIAGNOSIS; VOLUME; DELAY; CT;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25392
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: The authors studied growth and progression of untreated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by comparing diagnostic and radiotherapy (RT) planning fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans before proposed radical chemo-RT. METHODS: Patients enrolled on a prospective clinical trial were eligible for this analysis if they underwent 2 pretreatment whole body FDG-PET/CT scans, >7 days apart. Scan 1 was performed for diagnosis/disease staging and scan 2 for RT planning. Interscan comparisons included disease stage, metabolic characteristics, tumor doubling times, and change in treatment intent. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent planning PET/CT scans between October 2004 and February 2007. Of these, 28 patients (61% stage III, 18% stage II) had undergone prior staging PET/CT scans. The median interscan period was 24 days (range, 8-176 days). Interscan disease progression (TNM stage) was detected in 11(39%) patients. The probability of upstaging within 24 days was calculated to be 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-49%). Treatment intent changed from curative to palliative in 8 (29%) cases, in 7 because of PET. For 17 patients who underwent serial PET/CT scans under standardized conditions, there was a mean relative interscan increase of 19% in tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) (P = .022), 16% in average SUV (P = .004), and 116% in percentage injected dose (P = .002). Estimated doubling time of FDG avid tumor was 66 days (95% Cl, 51-95 days). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid tumor progression was detected in patients with untreated, predominantly stage III, NSCLC on serial FDG-PET/CT imaging, highlighting the need for prompt diagnosis, staging, and initiation of therapy in patients who are candidates for potentially curative therapy. Cancer 2010;116:5030-7. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5030 / 5037
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Is tumor volume an independent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radical radiotherapy? Interim analysis of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) database 99-05 [J].
Ball, D ;
Bryan, B ;
Peter, G ;
Penniment, M ;
Joseph, D ;
Poulsen, M ;
Krawitz, H ;
Wheeler, G ;
Fisher, R ;
McClure, B ;
MacCallum, P .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 :S208-S208
[2]
Can a mathematical formula help define a radiation target volume using positron emission tomography?: In regard to Black et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;: 60:1272-1282) [J].
Bayne, M ;
MacManus, M ;
Hicks, R ;
Leong, T ;
Peters, L ;
Ball, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (01) :299-300
[3]
MEASUREMENT OF GROWTH-RATE OF LUNG METASTASES IN 21 PATIENTS WITH BONE OR SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA [J].
BLOMQVIST, C ;
WIKLUND, T ;
TARKKANEN, M ;
ELOMAA, I ;
VIROLAINEN, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 68 (02) :414-417
[4]
Does treatment delay affect survival in non-small cell lung cancer? A retrospective analysis from a single UK centre [J].
Bozcuk, H ;
Martin, C .
LUNG CANCER, 2001, 34 (02) :243-252
[5]
The relationship between waiting time for radiotherapy and clinical outcomes: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Chen, Zheng ;
King, Will ;
Pearcey, Robert ;
Kerba, Marc ;
Mackillop, William J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 87 (01) :3-16
[6]
CLAVO AC, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1625
[7]
Quantification of progression of non-small cell lung cancer in the interval between diagnostic and radiotherapy treatment planning PET scans [J].
Eastham, D. V. ;
Weerasuriya, D. ;
Wakelee, H. ;
Quon, A. ;
Maxim, P. ;
Le, Q. ;
Graves, E. E. ;
Loo, B. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) :S520-S521
[8]
Friberg S, 1997, J SURG ONCOL, V65, P284, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199708)65:4<284::AID-JSO11>3.3.CO
[9]
2-N
[10]
Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th