Current nonverbal assessment instruments: A comparison of psychometric integrity and test fairness

被引:15
作者
Athanasiou, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No Colorado, Div Profess Psychol, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/073428290001800302
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This paper is a review of new and newly revised nonverbal tests of ability. Five nonverbal instruments were compared with regard to psychometric integrity and indications of test fairness. This comparison revealed that although the instruments examined are generally impressive in terms of technical adequacy and sensitivity of administration guidelines, they tend to present less statistical evidence of test fairness. Findings are discussed with regard to implications for users of nonverbal assessment instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 229
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
[2]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT REHABILIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1177/073428298700500402
[4]  
BRACKEN BA, 1998, UNVERSAL NONVERBAL I
[5]  
Brown L., 1997, TEST NONVERBAL INTEL
[6]  
CAMILLI G, 1994, METHODS IDENTIFIYING
[7]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[8]   THEORY OF FLUID AND CRYSTALLIZED INTELLIGENCE - A CRITICAL EXPERIMENT [J].
CATTELL, RB .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 54 (01) :1-22
[9]   A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NEW AND RECENTLY REVISED INTELLIGENCE-TESTS FOR PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN [J].
FLANAGAN, DP ;
ALFONSO, VC .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 13 (01) :66-90
[10]  
Hammill D. D., 2009, COMPREHENSIVE TEST N