Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction

被引:84
作者
Calancie, B
Harris, W
Brindle, GF
Green, BA
Landy, HJ
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Miaami Project Cure Paralysis, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
intraoperative monitoring; evoked potential; electromyography; repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2001.95.2.0161
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate repetitive transcranial stimulation (TES) to assess spinal cord motor tract function in individuals undergoing spine surgery, with emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEps) were elicited using standard technique. Muscle electromyographic values were measured in response to a three- or four-pulse train of stimulation delivered to the motor cortex via subdermal electrodes. They also evaluated whether changes in the minimum stimulus intensity (that is, threshold level) needed to elicit a response from a given muscle predict motor status immediately postoperatively. Anesthesia was routinely induced with intravenous propofol and remifentanil, supplemented with inhaled nitrous oxide. Use of neuromuscular block was avoided after intubation. Satisfactory monitoring of muscle response to threshold-level repetitive TES was achieved in all but nine of the 194 patients studied. In contrast, cortical SSEP responses could not be elicited in 42 of 194 individuals. In cases in which response were present, TES-based evoked responses proved to be extremely accurate for predicting postoperative motor status. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was nearly as accurate for predicting postoperative sensory status. There were frequent instances of postoperative motor or sensory deficit that were not predicted by SSEP- and TES-based monitoring, respectively. There were no adverse events attributable to TES-based monitoring, although since the study ended we have had a single adverse event attributable to threshold-level repetitive TES. Conclusions. Intraoperative threshold-level repetitive TES-based monitoring of central motor conduction has proven to be a simple, safe, and highly accurate technique for the prevention of minimization of inadvertent motor deficit during surgery involving the spine or spinal cord.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   ASSESSMENT OF CORTICOSPINAL AND SOMATOSENSORY CONDUCTION SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING SCOLIOSIS SURGERY [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, R ;
STEPHEN, J ;
WOODFORTH, I ;
CRAWFORD, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (06) :388-396
[2]   Surgical monitoring of motor pathways [J].
Burke, D ;
Hicks, RG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (03) :194-205
[3]   Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Broton, JG ;
Alexeeva, N ;
Green, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 88 (03) :457-470
[4]  
Cioni B, 1999, ARCH ITAL BIOL, V137, P115
[5]  
Daube JR, 1999, MUSCLE NERVE, V22, P1151, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199908)22:8<1151::AID-MUS24>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-T
[7]   Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli [J].
Deletis, V ;
Isgum, V ;
Amassian, VE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :438-444
[8]  
Gelber DA, 1999, MUSCLE NERVE, V22, P1154, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199908)22:8<1154::AID-MUS25>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-N
[10]   Strategies to prevent neurologic deficit based on motor-evoked potentials in type I and II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Jacobs, MJHM ;
Meylaerts, SA ;
de Haan, P ;
de Mol, BA ;
Kalkman, CJ .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (01) :48-57