Promotion Planning and Supply Chain Contracting in a High-Low Pricing Environment

被引:17
作者
Breiter, Andreas [1 ]
Huchzermeier, Arnd [1 ]
机构
[1] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Chair Prod Management, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
关键词
supply chain management; risk management; price promotions; retailing; BOOKING DISCOUNT PROGRAMS; CONSUMER; SALES; MODEL; PULL; RISK; PUSH;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12250
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
120111 [工业工程];
摘要
Demand forecast errors threaten the profitability of high-low price promotion strategies. This article shows how to match demand and supply effectively by means of two-segment demand forecasting and supply contracts. We find that demand depends on the path of past retail prices, which leads to only a limited number of reachable demand states. However, forecast errors cannot be entirely eliminated because competitive promotions entail some degree of random (i.e., last-minute) pricing. A hedging approach can be deployed to distribute demand risk efficiently over multiple promotional campaigns and within the supply chain. A retailer that employs a portfolio of forward, option, and spot contracts can avoid both stockouts and excess inventories while achieving the first-best solution and Pareto improvements. We provide an improved forecasting method as well as stochastic programs to solve for optimal production and purchasing policies such that the right amount of inventory is available at the right time. By connecting a stockpiling model of demand with the supply side, we derive insights on optimal risk management strategies for both manufacturers and retailers in a market environment characterized by frequent price promotions and multiple discount levels. We employ a data set of the German retail market for a key generator of store trafficnamely, diapers.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 236
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Arminger G., 2008, FORECSAST SHARING CP
[2]
Equilibrium Returns Policies in the Presence of Supplier Competition [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Subhajyoti ;
Paul, Anand A. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2010, 29 (05) :846-857
[3]
An empirical test of the Theory of Sales: Do household storage constraints affect consumer and store behavior? [J].
Bell, David R. ;
Hilber, Christian A. L. .
QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 4 (02) :87-117
[4]
The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[5]
Price competition under stockpiling and flexible consumption [J].
Bell, DR ;
Iyer, G ;
Padmanabhan, V .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (03) :292-303
[6]
A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION OF PRICE DEALS FOR CONSUMER NONDURABLES [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
EPPEN, GD ;
LIEBERMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1981, 45 (01) :116-129
[7]
HOW PROMOTIONS WORK [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
BRIESCH, R ;
FOX, EJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G122-G132
[8]
Breiter A., 2014, WORKING PAPER
[9]
Breiter A., 2010, INT COMMERCE REV, V9, P36
[10]
Option pricing with downward-sloping demand curves: The case of supply chain options [J].
Burnetas, A ;
Ritchken, P .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (04) :566-580