An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars

被引:72
作者
Bloemen, Monica C. T. [1 ,4 ]
van Gerven, Maaike S. [1 ,4 ]
van der Wal, Martijn B. A. [1 ,4 ]
Verhaegen, Pauline D. H. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Middelkoop, Esther [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, NL-1940 EA Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Red Cross Hosp, Burn Ctr, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
objective evaluation; reliability; relief; roughness; scars; skin; surface; validity; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION; LASER TECHNOLOGY; ASSESSMENT SCALE; FOLLOW-UP; TOPOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PROFILOMETRY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.006
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
Background: Scar formation remains a major clinical problem; therefore, various therapies have been developed to improve scar quality. To evaluate the effectiveness of these therapies, objective measurement tools are necessary. An appropriate, objective measuring instrument for assessment of surface roughness is not yet available in a clinical setting. The Phaseshift Rapid In Vivo Measurement of the Skin (PRIMOS) (GFMesstechnik GmbH, Teltow, Germany) could be such an instrument. This device noninvasively produces a 3-dimensional image of the skin microtopography and measures surface roughness. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the PRIMOS for objective and quantitative measurement of surface roughness of skin and scars. Methods: Three observers assessed skin and burn scars in 60 patients using the PRIMOS and a subjective scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation of intraobserver and interobserver measurements. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.7 or greater was required for reliable results. To test validity, scores of the PRIMOS were compared with scores of the subjective scale (Pearson correlation). A Pearson correlation coefficient greater than 0.6 was considered a strong positive correlation. Results: All 3 surface roughness parameters of the PRIMOS showed good intraobserver and interobserver reliability for skin and scars (intraclass correlation coefficient arithmetic mean of surface roughness > 0.85, mean of 5 highest peaks and 5 deepest valleys from entire measuring field > 0.88, peak count > 0.86). The parameter arithmetic mean of surface roughness showed a strong correlation with the subjective score (Pearson arithmetic mean of surface roughness 0.70; mean of 5 highest peaks and 5 deepest valleys from entire measuring field 0.53; peak count 0.54). Limitations: The reliability and validity of the PRIMOS were only tested on skin and burn scars, not in other dermatologic diseases. Conclusions: The PRIMOS is a valid and reliable tool for objective noninvasive evaluation of surface roughness of both skin and burn scars.(J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:706-15.)
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 715
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[2]
Bartell T H, 1988, J Burn Care Rehabil, V9, P657, DOI 10.1097/00004630-198811000-00021
[3]
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[4]
Successful treatment of acneiform scarring with CO2 ablative fractional resurfacing [J].
Chapas, Anne M. ;
Brightman, Lori ;
Sukal, Sean ;
Hale, Elizabeth ;
Daniel, David ;
Bernstein, Leonard J. ;
Geronemus, Roy G. .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 40 (06) :381-386
[5]
CORCUFF P, 1982, BIOENG SKIN, V4
[6]
Microrelief of the skin using a light transmission method [J].
De Paepe, K ;
Lagarde, JM ;
Gall, Y ;
Roseeuw, D ;
Rogiers, V .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 292 (10) :500-510
[7]
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[8]
Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Kreis, RW ;
Middelkoop, E ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
BURNS, 2004, 30 (02) :109-114
[9]
Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation? [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Kreis, RW ;
Middelkoop, E ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
BURNS, 2004, 30 (02) :103-107
[10]
Direct and non-direct measurement techniques for analysis of skin surface topography [J].
Fischer, TW ;
Wigger-Alberti, W ;
Elsner, P .
SKIN PHARMACOLOGY AND APPLIED SKIN PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 12 (1-2) :1-11