Transboundary externalities in the environmental transition hypothesis

被引:29
作者
Ansuategi, A [1 ]
Perrings, C
机构
[1] Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Ekon Analisiaren Oinarriak, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
environmental transition; growth; Kuznets; pollution; transboundary externalities;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026507017843
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) is a hypothesis which implies that it is possible to :grow out of environmental degradation''. Most theoretical models of the EKC relation have not accounted for transboundary and intergenerational externalities nor have empirical studies provided evidence that validates an inverted U shaped relation between environmental degradation and economic growth for pollution problems where the effects are far-displaced or are long-delayed. This paper integrates the theory of transboundary externalities into the most common theoretical framework applied to the EKC hypothesis. It shows that where a significant proportion of the environmental impacts of economic activity occurs outside the territories in which those activities take place, the de-linking of growth and environmental degradation is less likely to happen. This proposition is demonstrated by assuming that decisionmakers have a Nash-type non cooperative strategic behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 373
页数:21
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], AM ECON REV
  • [2] [Anonymous], MODELS EC GROWTH ENV
  • [3] ANSUATEGI A, 1996, USF WORKSH EC MOD SU
  • [4] ANSUATEGI A, 1999, UNPUB INTERGENERATIO
  • [5] ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CARRYING-CAPACITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT
    ARROW, K
    BOLIN, B
    COSTANZA, R
    DASGUPTA, P
    FOLKE, C
    HOLLING, CS
    JANSSON, BO
    LEVIN, S
    MALER, KG
    PERRINGS, C
    PIMENTEL, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5210) : 520 - 521
  • [6] Arrow K. J., 1969, ANAL EVALUATION PUBL, V1
  • [7] Barbier Edward B., 1997, Environment and Development Economics, V2, P369, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1355770X97000193
  • [8] Brock W. A., 1977, EC NATURAL ENV RESOU
  • [9] Cass D., 1965, REV ECON STUD, V32, P233, DOI [10.2307/2295827, DOI 10.2307/2295827]
  • [10] Cole M.A., 1997, Environment and Development Economics, V2, P401, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1355770X97000211