The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents

被引:36
作者
Bloch, SH
Short, RE
Ferrara, KW
Wisner, ER
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] POINT Biomed Corp, San Carlos, CA USA
关键词
ultrasound; contrast agent; microbubbles; submicron; polymer-shelled; acoustic response;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.016
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In this technical note, we study three polymer-shelled microbubble contrast agents manufactured by POINT Biomedical Corporation that have identical shell composition and mean volumetric diameters of 0.74 mu m, 0.91 mu m and 1.33 mu m. We investigate the effect of agent size on the amplitude, frequency and probability of acoustic echoes received in response to five-cycle, 2.25-MHz pulses of varying pressure. We find that the amplitude and frequency response from the three agents is not significantly different. However, significant differences among the agents do exist in the probability of response to acoustic interrogation: at a pressure of 1.06 MPa, an echo from the 1.33 mu m agent is 5 times as likely as an echo from the 0.91 mu m agent and 18 times as likely as an echo from the 0.74 mu m agent. We hypothesize that there exists an effective pressure-dependent threshold diameter above which single polymer-shelled agents respond to acoustic interrogation. (c) 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 444
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   PARTICLE SIZING AND BIOKINETICS OF INTERSTITIAL LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHIC AGENTS [J].
BERGQVIST, L ;
STRAND, SE ;
PERSSON, BRR .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (01) :9-19
[2]   Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents [J].
Bloch, SH ;
Wan, M ;
Dayton, PA ;
Ferrara, KW .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2004, 84 (04) :631-633
[3]   A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents [J].
Chen, WS ;
Matula, TJ ;
Brayman, AA ;
Crum, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :643-651
[4]   Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Dayton, P ;
May, D ;
Ferrara, K .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2001, 6 (02) :141-150
[5]   Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Dayton, P ;
Allen, J ;
Morgan, K ;
Ferrara, KW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2001, 48 (01) :232-248
[6]  
COOPER PW, 1996, INTRO TECHNOLOGY EXP, P125
[7]   Evidence for breaches of the retinal vasculature in acquired immune deficiency syndrome angiopathy - A fluorescent microsphere study [J].
Glasgow, BJ .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05) :753-760
[8]   Sentinel lymph nodes in a swine model with melanoma: Contrast-enhanced lymphatic US [J].
Goldberg, BB ;
Merton, DA ;
Liu, JB ;
Thakur, M ;
Murphy, GF ;
Needleman, L ;
Tornes, A ;
Forsberg, F .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :727-734
[9]   Sentinel lymph node imaging with microbubble ultrasound contrast material [J].
Mattrey, RF ;
Kono, Y ;
Baker, K ;
Peterson, T .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 :S231-S235
[10]   New method of sentinel node identification with ultrasonography using albumin as contrast agent: A study in pigs [J].
Omoto, K ;
Mizunuma, H ;
Ogura, S ;
Hozumi, Y ;
Nagai, H ;
Taniguchi, N ;
Itoh, K .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 28 (09) :1115-1122