A randomised open-label study of tiagabine given two or three times daily in refractory epilepsyb

被引:9
作者
Arroyo, S
Boothman, BR
Brodie, MJ
Duncan, JS
Duncan, R
Nieto, M
Calandre, EP
Forcadas, I
Crawford, PM
机构
[1] York Dist Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosci, York YO31 7HE, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Neurol Serv, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Preston Acute Hosp, Preston PR2 9HT, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Med, Epilepsy Res Unit, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Chalfont Ctr Epilepsy, Bucksburn SL9 0RJ, Aberdeen, Scotland
[6] So Gen Hosp, Inst Neurol Sci, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Hosp Virgen Rocio, Consultas Externas Neuropediat, Seville 41013, Spain
[8] Fac Med, Catedra Farmacol, Granada 18012, Spain
[9] Hosp Cruces, Dept Neurol, Baracaldo 48903, Vizcaya, Spain
来源
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY | 2005年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
tiagabine; antiepileptic drugs; anticonvulsant; drug administration; epilepsy; seizures;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2004.09.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine was evaluated in patients with non-controlled partial seizures in a multicentre, open-label, parallel group study. Tiagabine was administered either two (b.i.d.) or three times daily (t.i.d.) as adjunctive therapy and titrated stepwise to a target of 40 mg/day during a 12-week, fixed-schedule titration period; this was followed by a 12-week flexible continuation period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients completing the fixed-schedule titration period. A total of 243 patients were randomised and received treatment, 123 to b.i.d. and 120 to t.i.d. dosing. Fewer patients in the b.i.d. (76 and 62%) than in the t.i.d. (87 and 72%) group completed the fixed-schedule titration period (OR: 0.562; 95% Cl: 0.309-1.008; P = 0.0532). The median percentage decrease in all types of seizure (excluding status epilepticus) during the fixed schedule titration period was 33.4% for the b.i.d. and 23.8% for the t.i.d. groups (P = 0.9634; Van Elteren's test). The proportion of responders was similar for the b.i.d. and t.i.d. groups. There were no significant differences between dosage regimens in the change in Median seizure rates from baseline. Adverse events were more frequent during the titration than the continuation period. Most events were mild and related to the central nervous system. Although their incidence was similar between treatment groups, severity was more frequent in the b.i.d. group. Our results suggest that during titration tiagabine is better tolerated with t.i.d. dosing, but during long-term maintenance, a t.i.d. schedule is as effective and well tolerated as b.i.d. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of BEA Trading Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 84
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
Biraben A, 2001, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V3, P91
[2]   Review of controlled trials of gabitril (tiagabine): A clinician's viewpoint [J].
Loiseau, P .
EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 :S14-S19
[3]   Pharmacokinetics of tiagabine as add-on therapy in patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepilepsy drugs [J].
So, EL ;
Wolff, D ;
Graves, NM ;
Leppik, IE ;
Cascino, GD ;
Pixton, GC ;
Gustavson, LE .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (03) :221-226
[4]  
VANELTEREN P, 1960, B INT STATIST INST, V37, P351