North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens

被引:226
作者
Marks, JG [1 ]
Belsito, DV [1 ]
DeLeo, VA [1 ]
Fowler, JF [1 ]
Fransway, AF [1 ]
Maibach, HI [1 ]
Mathias, CGT [1 ]
Nethercott, JR [1 ]
Rietschel, RL [1 ]
Sherertz, EF [1 ]
Storrs, FJ [1 ]
Taylor, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Div Dermatol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0190-9622(98)70587-0
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Allergic contact dermatitis is a significant cause of cutaneous disease affecting many individuals. Patch testing, when used properly, often provides support for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This article reports patch testing results from July 1, 1994, to June 30, 1996, by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG). Methods: Patients evaluated in our patch test clinics were tested with the same screening series of allergens by the use of a standardized patch testing technique. The data from these patients were recorded on a standard computer entry form and analyzed. Results: Forty-nine allergens were tested on 3120 patients. Budesonide was added to the series in July 1995 and tested on 1678 patients. Of these patients, 66.5% had positive allergic patch test reactions, and 57% bad at least one allergic reaction that was felt to be clinically relevant to the present or past dermatitis. The 20 screening allergens commercially available to United States dermatologists in the Allergen Patch Test Kit, accounted for only 54.1% of the patients with positive allergic reactions. The additional 30 allergens on the NACDG screening series accounted for 47% of patients with positive allergic reactions. Had the Allergen Patch Test Kit alone been used, 12.4% of all patients tested may have had their disease misclassified as a nonallergic disorder, and an additional 34.4% of all tested patients would not have had their allergies fully defined. Among those patients with positive responses to the supplemental allergens, 81% of the responses were of present or past relevance. The 12 most frequent contact allergens were nickel sulfate, fragrance mix, thimerosal, quaternium-15, neomycin sulfate, formaldehyde, bacitracin, thiuram mix, balsam of Peru, cobalt chloride, para-phenylenediamine, and carba mix. The present relevance varied with the specific allergen from 10.7% (thimerosal) to 85.7% (quaternium-15). Among newer allergens, methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol (cosmetic preservative) caused positive allergic reactions in 2% of the patients; tixocortol-21-pivalate and budesonide (corticosteroids), in 2.0% and 1.1% of the patients, respectively; and ethylene urea/melamine formaldehyde mix (textile resin), in 5% of the patients. Conclusion: The usefulness of patch testing is enhanced with the number of allergens tested, because allergens not found on the commercially available screening series in the United States frequently give relevant allergic reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 918
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A 5-YEAR STUDY OF COSMETIC REACTIONS [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
MAIBACH, HI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1985, 13 (06) :1062-1069
[2]   Utility of a standard allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: A retrospective study of 732 patients [J].
Cohen, DE ;
Brancaccio, R ;
Andersen, D ;
Belsito, DV .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1997, 36 (06) :914-918
[3]   Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): An important ''new'' allergen in cosmetics [J].
DeGroot, AC ;
vanGinkel, CJW ;
Weijland, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 (05) :743-747
[4]  
Dooms-Goossens, 1993, AM J CONTACT DERMATI, V4, P120
[5]   ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS FROM FORMALDEHYDE RESINS IN PERMANENT PRESS CLOTHING - AN UNDERDIAGNOSED CAUSE OF GENERALIZED DERMATITIS [J].
FOWLER, JF ;
SKINNER, SM ;
BELSITO, DV .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 27 (06) :962-968
[6]   FREQUENCY OF POSTOPERATIVE ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS TO TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS [J].
GETTE, MT ;
MARKS, JG ;
MALONEY, ME .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 128 (03) :365-367
[7]   THE ALLERGENS OF NAIL POLISH .1. ALLERGENIC CONSTITUENTS OF COMMON NAIL POLISH AND TOLUENESULFONAMIDE-FORMALDEHYDE RESIN (TS-F-R) [J].
HAUSEN, BM ;
MILBRODT, M ;
KOENIG, WA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (03) :157-164
[8]   AMERICAN-ACADEMY-OF-DERMATOLOGY PATCH TESTING SURVEY - USE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS PROCEDURE [J].
JAMES, WD ;
ROSENTHAL, LE ;
BRANCACCIO, RR ;
MARKS, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 26 (06) :991-994
[9]  
Koppula SV., 1995, AM J CONTACT DERMATI, V6, P78, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.1995.3304
[10]   AN AUDIT OF THE VALUE OF PATCH TESTING - THE PATIENTS PERSPECTIVE [J].
LEWIS, FM ;
CORK, MJ ;
MCDONAGH, AJG ;
GAWKRODGER, DJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1994, 30 (04) :214-216