A comparison of three-level converters versus two-level converters for low-voltage drives, traction, and utility applications

被引：430

作者：

Teichmann, R ^{[1
]}

Bernet, S

机构：

[1] GE Global Res, Moscow 123098, Russia

[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Fak Elekrotech & Informat 4, Inst Energie Automat Tech, Fachgebiet Leistungselek, D-10587 Berlin, Germany

来源：

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS | 2005年 / 41卷 / 03期

关键词：

life-cycle cost; multilevel converters; semiconductor losses;

D O I：

10.1109/TIA.2005.847285

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

This paper evaluates three-level topologies as alternatives to two-level topologies in converters for low-voltage applications. Topologies, semiconductor losses, filter aspects, part count, initial cost, and life-cycle cost are compared for a grid interface, a conventional drive application, and a high-speed drive application.

引用

页码：855 / 865

页数：11

共 30 条

[1]

ALNASEEM O, 2000, P APEC 2000 FEB 6 10, V1, P242

[2] Design and loss comparison of matrix converters and voltage-source converters for modern AC drives [J].