Associational and nonassociational mechanisms in locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole

被引:40
作者
Einat, H [1 ]
Einat, D [1 ]
Allan, M [1 ]
Talangbayan, H [1 ]
Tsafnat, T [1 ]
Szechtman, H [1 ]
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT BIOMED SCI,HAMILTON,ON L8N 3Z5,CANADA
关键词
hyperactivity; rats; reverse tolerance; context-dependent sensitization; context-independent sensitization; conditioned locomotion; D-2/D-3; agonist;
D O I
10.1007/BF02805980
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A pairing paradigm was employed to explore the contribution of associational mechanisms to the expression of sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Rats received ten quinpirole injections in the test environment (Group Paired) or in the home cage (Group Unpaired), and saline in the alternate environment. A third group received saline injections in both environments (Group Acute). Subjects received quinpirole on the 11th injection as a test for locomotor sensitization, and saline on the next injection as a test for conditioned activity. The range of discriminative stimuli predicting a drug versus a non-drug injection was increased across three independent experiments in an effort to detect a possible associational effect. Regardless of the strength of discriminative stimuli, both Paired and Unpaired groups showed locomotor sensitization to 0.5 mg/kg quinpirole compared with the Acute group. However, the Paired group showed more locomotion than the Unpaired group in the last minutes of the sensitization test. With a lower sensitizing dose of quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg) used in one experiment, only the Paired group showed locomotor sensitization. For both doses, the Paired, but not the Unpaired groups showed conditioned locomotion. It is suggested that with moderate doses of quinpirole, expression of locomotor sensitization does not require drug-signalling cues though such signals may have a modulatory influence. With lower quinpirole doses, however, quinpirole sensitization is context-dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 101
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AHMED SH, 1993, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V4, P355
[2]  
ANGRIST B, 1983, STIMULANTS NEUROCHEM, P1
[3]  
Antelman S. M., 1988, SENSITIZATION NERVOU, P227
[4]   INFLUENCE OF NOVEL VERSUS HOME ENVIRONMENTS ON SENSITIZATION TO THE PSYCHOMOTOR STIMULANT EFFECTS OF COCAINE AND AMPHETAMINE [J].
BADIANI, A ;
BROWMAN, KE ;
ROBINSON, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 674 (02) :291-298
[5]   MORPHINE-TOLERANCE AS HABITUATION [J].
BAKER, TB ;
TIFFANY, ST .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1985, 92 (01) :78-108
[6]   CHARACTERISTICS OF REVERSE TOLERANCE TO AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED LOCOMOTOR STIMULATION IN MICE [J].
CHAUDHRY, IA ;
TURKANIS, SA ;
KARLER, R .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 27 (08) :777-781
[7]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION TO APOMORPHINE IS BLOCKED BY MK-801 [J].
DRUHAN, JP ;
JAKOB, A ;
STEWART, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 243 (01) :73-77
[8]   DOPAMINERGIC CONTROL OF LOCOMOTION, MOUTHING, SNOUT CONTACT, AND GROOMING - OPPOSING ROLES OF D1-RECEPTORS AND D2-RECEPTORS [J].
EILAM, D ;
TALANGBAYAN, H ;
CANARAN, G ;
SZECHTMAN, H .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 (04) :447-454
[9]   BIPHASIC EFFECT OF D-2 AGONIST QUINPIROLE ON LOCOMOTION AND MOVEMENTS [J].
EILAM, D ;
SZECHTMAN, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 161 (2-3) :151-157
[10]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF D1-DOPAMINE AND D2-DOPAMINE AGONISTS ON STEREOTYPED LOCOMOTION IN RATS [J].
EILAM, D ;
CLEMENTS, KVA ;
SZECHTMAN, H .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 45 (02) :117-124