Mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction and the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation

被引:250
作者
Knoll, GA
MacDonald, I
Khan, A
Van Walraven, C
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Div Nephrol, Kidney Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2003年 / 14卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ASN.0000079616.71891.F5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly decreases acute rejection rates after renal transplantation, but intolerance often occurs, leading to dose reduction. The clinical effect of MMF dose reduction has not been clearly established. This study determined whether MMF dose reduction after renal transplantation was associated with subsequent risk of acute rejection. This retrospective cohort study assessed 213 renal transplant recipients. Cox regression was used to model MMF dose as a time-dependent variable, with time to first acute rejection as the primary outcome. One hundred twenty-six patients (59%) had a total of 176 MMF dose reductions during the study. MMF dose was reduced because of leukopenia (55.1%), gastrointestinal symptoms (22.2%), infection (7.4%), malignancy (1.1%), and unknown reasons (14.2%). The cumulative number of days with the MMF dose reduced below full dose was an independent predictor of acute rejection. The relative risk of rejection increased by 4% for every week that the MMF dose was reduced below full dose. No significant association was observed between the number of days with MMF dropped below full dose and allograft failure. The cumulative number of days with the MMF dose dropped below full dose is a significant predictor of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Clinicians need to be aware of the rejection risk when the MMF dose is reduced and maintain close surveillance on such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2381 / 2386
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation, 2002, Nephrol Dial Transplant, V17 Suppl 4, P49
[2]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[3]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection [J].
Halloran, P ;
Mathew, T ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Groth, C ;
Hooftman, L ;
Barker, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) :39-47
[4]   Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. [J].
Hariharan, S ;
Johnson, CP ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Taranto, SE ;
McIntosh, MJ ;
Stablein, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (09) :605-612
[5]   Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia secondary to heart transplantation [J].
Huebner, G ;
Karthaus, M ;
Pethig, K ;
Freund, M ;
Ganser, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (04) :688-690
[6]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[7]   African-American renal transplant recipients experience decreased risk of death due to infection: Possible implications for immunosuppressive strategies [J].
Meier-Kriesche, HU ;
Ojo, A ;
Magee, JC ;
Cibrik, DM ;
Hanson, JA ;
Leichtman, AB ;
Kaplan, B .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (02) :375-379
[8]  
Miller J, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, P875
[9]  
Mourad M, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P88
[10]   Immunosuppressive therapy in high-risk transplant patients - Dose-dependent efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in African-American renal allograft recipients [J].
Neylan, JF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (09) :1277-1282