Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Clinical and electrophysiological features and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

被引:15
作者
Amasyali, B [1 ]
Kose, S
Aytemir, K
Kilic, A
Heper, G
Kursaklioglu, H
Iyisoy, A
Celik, T
Kaya, EB
Isik, E
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Cardiol, TR-06018 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
atrial fibrillation; atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; catheter ablation;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-005-2225-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied in a large patient cohort. We aimed to define the clinical features and cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of these patients, and to examine the incidence and identify predictors of AF recurrences after elimination of AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) and 497 patients with AVNRT alone undergoing ablation in the same period (Group 2) were studied. There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical features, except age, which was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Presence of atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting > 30 seconds) and multiple AH jumps (>= 50 ms) before ablation were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 (p < 0.001, p = 0.010 respectively). During follow-up of 34 +/- 11 months, AF recurred in 10 patients (28%) in Group 1, while 2 patients in Group 2 (0.4%) developed paroxysmal AF (p < 0.001). Univariate predictors of AF were: left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.001), presence of mitral or aortic calcification (p = 0.003), atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.015) and valvular disease (p = 0.042). However, independent predictors of AF recurrences were left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.002) and the presence of atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.034). Conclusion: In patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF, the recurrence rate of AF after elimination of AVNRT is 28%. Left atrial diameter greater than 40 mm and atrial vulnerability after elimination of AVNRT are independent predictors of AF recurrences in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Nonuniform anisotropy is responsible for age-related slowing of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia [J].
Anselme, F ;
Frederiks, J ;
Papageorgiou, P ;
Monahan, KM ;
Epstein, LM ;
Spach, MS ;
Josephson, ME .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (12) :1145-1153
[2]   Atrial fibrillation induced by atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia [J].
Brugada, J ;
Mont, L ;
Matas, M ;
NavarroLopez, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (05) :681-682
[3]   ATRIAL CONDUCTION - EFFECTS OF EXTRASTIMULI WITH AND WITHOUT ATRIAL DYSRHYTHMIAS [J].
BUXTON, AE ;
WAXMAN, HL ;
MARCHLINSKI, FE ;
JOSEPHSON, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 54 (07) :755-761
[4]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF VOLUME LOAD IN ISOLATED CANINE HEARTS [J].
CALKINS, H ;
MAUGHAN, WL ;
KASS, DA ;
SAGAWA, K ;
LEVINE, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 256 (06) :H1697-H1706
[5]   EFFECTS OF AN ACUTE INCREASE IN ATRIAL PRESSURE ON ATRIAL REFRACTORINESS IN HUMANS [J].
CALKINS, H ;
ELATASSI, R ;
KALBFLEISCH, S ;
LANGBERG, J ;
MORADY, F .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (11) :1674-1680
[6]   Dependence of electrogram duration in right posteroseptal atrium and atrium-pulmonary vein junction on pacing site: Mechanism and implications regarding atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [J].
Chen, YJ ;
Tai, CT ;
Hsieh, MH ;
Tsai, CF ;
Lin, WS ;
Chen, SA .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (05) :506-515
[7]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC STUDIES IN ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - SLOW CONDUCTION OF PREMATURE IMPULSES - A POSSIBLE MANIFESTATION OF THE BACKGROUND FOR REENTRY [J].
COSIO, FG ;
PALACIOS, J ;
VIDAL, JM ;
COCINA, EG ;
GOMEZSANCHEZ, MA ;
TAMARGO, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 51 (01) :122-130
[8]   Clinical usefulness of slow pathway ablation in patients with both paroxysmal atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation [J].
Delise, P ;
Gianfranchi, L ;
Paparella, N ;
Brignole, M ;
Menozzi, C ;
Themistoclakis, S ;
Mantovan, R ;
Bonso, A ;
Coro, L ;
Vaglio, A ;
Ragazzo, M ;
Alboni, P ;
Raviele, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (10) :1421-+
[9]   Evaluation of atrial vulnerability with transoesophageal stimulation in patients with atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia - Comparison with patients with ventricular pre-excitation anti with normal subjects [J].
DEste, D ;
Pasqual, A ;
Bertaglia, M ;
Meneghello, MP ;
Zanocco, A ;
Delise, P ;
DEste, F ;
Pascotto, P .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 16 (11) :1632-1636
[10]  
ELVAS L, 1994, CAN J CARDIOL, V10, P342