A model to explain the various paradoxes associated with mantle noble gas geochemistry

被引:62
作者
Anderson, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Seismol Lab 25221, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.95.16.9087
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As a result of an energetic accretion, the Earth is a volatile-poor and strongly differentiated planet. The volatile elements can be accounted for by a late veneer (approximate to 1% of total mass of the Earth), The incompatible elements are strongly concentrated into the exosphere (atmosphere, oceans, sediments, and crust) and upper mantle. Recent geochemical models invoke a large primordial undegassed reservoir with chondritic abundances of uranium and helium, which is clearly at odds with mass and energy balance calculations, The basic assumption behind these models is that excess "primordial" He-3 is responsible for He-3/He-4 ratios higher than the average for midocean ridge basalts, The evidence however favors depletion of He-3 and excessive depletion of He-4 and, therefore, favors a refractory, residual (low U, Th) source Petrological processes such as melt-crystal and melt-gas separation fractionate helium from U and Th and, with time, generate inhomogeneities in the He-3/He-4 ratio. A self-consistent model for noble gases involves a gas-poor planet with trapping of CO2 and noble gases in the shallow mantle. Such trapped gases are released by later tectonic and magmatic processes. Most of the mantle was depleted and degassed during the accretion process. High He-3/He-4 gases are viewed as products of ancient gas exsolution stored in low U environments, rather than products of primordial reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页码:9087 / 9092
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   THE TRAPPED FLUID PHASE IN UPPER MANTLE XENOLITHS FROM VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR MANTLE METASOMATISM [J].
ANDERSEN, T ;
OREILLY, SY ;
GRIFFIN, WL .
CONTRIBUTIONS TO MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY, 1984, 88 (1-2) :72-85
[2]  
Anderson D.L., 1989, Theory of the Earth, P366
[3]  
Anderson D.L., 1996, INT GEOL REV, V38, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/00206819709465320
[4]   LITHOSPHERE, ASTHENOSPHERE, AND PERISPHERE [J].
ANDERSON, DL .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 33 (01) :125-149
[5]   The helium paradoxes [J].
Anderson, DL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (09) :4822-4827
[6]   HE-3 FROM THE MANTLE - PRIMORDIAL SIGNAL OR COSMIC DUST [J].
ANDERSON, DL .
SCIENCE, 1993, 261 (5118) :170-176
[7]  
BIRCH F, 1965, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V76, P133, DOI 10.1130/0016-7606(1965)76[133:SOTETH]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
BOSS AP, 1990, ORIGIN EARTH, P375
[10]   HIMU EM - THE FRENCH-POLYNESIAN CONNECTION [J].
CHAUVEL, C ;
HOFMANN, AW ;
VIDAL, P .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1992, 110 (1-4) :99-119