Population-level inferences for distributed MEG source localization under multiple constraints: Application to face-evoked fields

被引:49
作者
Henson, R. N.
Mattout, J.
Singh, K. D.
Bames, G. R.
Hillebrand, A.
Friston, K. J.
机构
[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
[2] INSERM, U821 Brain Dynam & Cognit, Lyon, France
[3] Cardiff Univ, CUBRIC, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Aston Univ, Wellcome Trust Lab MEG Studies, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[6] UCL, Funct Imaging Lab, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
magnetoencephalography; inverse problem; restricted maximum likelihood; INFORMED BASIS FUNCTIONS; EEG SOURCE LOCALIZATION; BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION; RECONSTRUCTION; BEAMFORMER; PERCEPTION; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.026
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We address some key issues entailed by population inference about responses evoked in distributed brain systems using magnetoencephalography (MEG). In particular, we look at model selection issues at the within-subject level and feature selection issues at the between-subject level, using responses evoked by intact and scrambled faces around 170 ms (M170). We compared the face validity of subject-specific forward models and their summary statistics in terms of how estimated responses reproduced over subjects. At the within-subject level, we focused on the use of multiple constraints, or priors, for inverting distributed source models. We used restricted maximum likelihood (ReML) estimates of prior covariance components (in both sensor and source space) and show that their relative importance is conserved over subjects. At the between-subject level, we used standard anatomical normalization methods to create posterior probability maps that furnish inference about regionally specific population responses. We used these to compare different summary statistics, namely; (i) whether to test for differences between condition-specific source estimates, or whether to test the source estimate of differences between conditions, and (ii) whether to accommodate differences in source orientation by using signed or unsigned (absolute) estimates of source activity. Crown Copyright (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 438
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Unified segmentation [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :839-851
[2]  
Ashburner J, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P254, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:4<254::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-G
[4]   Electromagnetic brain mapping [J].
Baillet, S ;
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2001, 18 (06) :14-30
[5]   Top-down facilitation of visual recognition [J].
Bar, M ;
Kassam, KS ;
Ghuman, AS ;
Boshyan, J ;
Schmidt, AM ;
Dale, AM ;
Hämäläinen, MS ;
Marinkovic, K ;
Schacter, DL ;
Rosen, BR ;
Halgren, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (02) :449-454
[6]   Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images [J].
Barnes, GR ;
Hillebrand, A .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 18 (01) :1-12
[7]   Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity [J].
Dale, AM ;
Liu, AK ;
Fischl, BR ;
Buckner, RL ;
Belliveau, JW ;
Lewine, JD ;
Halgren, E .
NEURON, 2000, 26 (01) :55-67
[8]   IMPROVED LOCALIZATION OF CORTICAL ACTIVITY BY COMBINING EEG AND MEG WITH MRI CORTICAL SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION - A LINEAR-APPROACH [J].
DALE, AM ;
SERENO, MI .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (02) :162-176
[9]  
Fischl B, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P272, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-4