All author citations versus first author citations

被引：84

作者：

Persson, O ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Umea Univ, Inforsk, Dept Sociol, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden

来源：

SCIENTOMETRICS | 2001年 / 50卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1023/A:1010534009428

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

Based on a set of information science papers this study demonstrates that "all a.uthor" citation counts should be preferred when visualizing the structure of research fields. "First author" citation studies distort the picture in terms of most influential researchers, while the subfield structure tends to be just about the same for both methods.

引用

页码：339 / 344

页数：6

共 9 条

[1] Egghe L, 2000, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V51, P145, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO
[2] 2-9
[3] PRODUCTION AND CITATION MEASURES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE - THE PROBLEM OF MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP
LINDSEY, D
[J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1980, 10 (02) : 145 - 162
[4] Persson O, 2000, CURR SCI INDIA, V79, P590
[5] PERSSON O, 1994, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V45, P31, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO
[6] 2-G
[7] AUTHOR COCITATION - A LITERATURE MEASURE OF INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE
WHITE, HD
GRIFFITH, BC
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1981, 32 (03): : 163 - 171
[8] White HD, 1998, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V49, P327, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO
[9] 2-W

← 1 →