Hyperbaric oxygen for children with cerebral palsy: a randomised multicentre trial

被引:102
作者
Collet, JP
Vanasse, M
Marois, P
Amar, M
Goldberg, J
Lambert, J
Lassonde, M
Hardy, P
Fortin, J
Tremblay, SD
Montgomery, D
Lacroix, J
Robinson, A
Majnemer, A
机构
[1] Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish Gen Hosp, Randomised Clin Trial Unit, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[2] Hop St Justine, Pediat Neurol Dept, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[3] Hop St Justine, Speech Therapy Dept, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[4] Hop St Justine, Ctr Readaptat Marie Enfant, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[5] Hop St Justine, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[6] Ctr Hosp Hotel Dieu Levis, Levis, PQ, Canada
[7] McGill Univ, Dept Educ Phys, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] Inst Maritime Quebec, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[9] Ctr Hosp Reg Rimouski, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[10] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[11] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[12] McGill Univ, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04054-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The use of hyperbaric oxygen for children with cerebral palsy has spread worldwide, despite little scientific evidence of efficacy. We did a randomised trial to assess the efficacy and side-effects of this form of therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Methods 111 children with cerebral palsy aged 3-12 years were randomly assigned hyperbaric oxygen (n=57) or slightly pressurised room air (n=54). All children received 40 treatments over 2 months. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment was Ih in 100% oxygen at 1.75 atmospheres absolute (ATA); children on slightly pressurised air received air at 1.3 ATA (the lowest pressure at which pressure can be felt, thereby ensuring the maintenance of masking). The main outcome measure was gross motor function. Secondary outcomes included performance in activities of daily living, attention, working memory, and speech. Findings For all outcomes, both groups improved over the course of the study, but without any difference between the two treatments. The score on the global gross motor function measure increased by 3.0% in the children on slightly pressurised air and 2.9% in those on hyperbaric oxygen. The mean difference between treatments was -0.40 (95% CI -1.69 to 0.90, p=0.544). Other changes were seen in speech, attention, memory, and functional skills. Ear problems occurred in 27 children treated by hyperbaric oxygen and in 15 treated with hyperbaric air (p=0.004). Interpretation In this study, hyperbaric oxygen did not improve the condition of children with cerebral palsy compared with slightly pressurised air. The improvement seen in both groups for all dimensions tested deserves further consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 586
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TOVA TEST VARIABLES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, REFERENCE MANUAL COM
[3]  
[Anonymous], PED PHYS THER
[4]  
BIETHER JK, 1993, PEDIAT PERINATOL EPI, V6, P339
[5]   Middle ear barotrauma in patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy [J].
Blanshard, J ;
Toma, A ;
Bryson, P ;
Williamson, P .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1996, 21 (05) :400-403
[6]  
BLEILE K, 1994, MANUAL ARTICULATION, P120
[7]  
BOWER E, 1992, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V34, P25
[8]  
DELATOLAS J, 1993, ETUDE EPIDEMIOLOGIQU
[9]  
DUDLEY JG, 1980, BATTERIE TESTS LANGA
[10]   CONCURRENT AND CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE PEDIATRIC EVALUATION OF DISABILITY INVENTORY [J].
FELDMAN, AB ;
HALEY, SM ;
CORYELL, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1990, 70 (10) :602-610